萨特与尼采哲学思想之异同

The Similarities & Differences Between Sartre's & Nietzsche's Philosophical Ideas

在尼采和萨特之间存在一些明显的总体上的一致性 ,尼采和萨特都是激烈的无神论者 ,他们直面宇宙没有内在意义或目的的事实 ,而不像其他一些思想家试图用谈论绝对精神或绝对存在来代替基督教神学死了的上帝。然而 ,萨特与尼采相比却是一位既不那么彻底也对生活更少肯定的思想家 ;更令人啼笑皆非的是 ,他是那么地强调自由 ,却拒绝给予意识以能力去克服成为自在自为这一不能满足的渴望 ,并不对自己反对自然和生成的柏拉图式的偏见提出疑问。当萨特说意识是虚无或一种缺失 ,是存在中不能填满的黑洞时 ,尼采却把人的存在与积极性和富足联系在一起 ,并且他完全抛弃了柏拉图的世界观和一切形而上学形式的悲观主义。

Obviously, there are some general similarities between Sartre and Nietzsche's philosophy ideas. Both of them are atheists, unlike the other thinkers who tried to discuss the absolute spirit or absolute existence to replace the dead God of the Christianity, they look straight into the meaningless and aimless facts in the world. However, compared with Nietzsche, Sartre is not a complete thinker, nor has he more optimistic opinion towards life.