陆家豪非“独立董事”及其责任承担的质疑——全国首例“花瓶董事”状告证监会案引发的法律思考

Lu Jiahao was not an "Independent Director'and the Responsibility He Beared was Challenged——Reflections on law caused by our nation's first particular case-"Vase Director"accused SRC

全国首例“花瓶董事”陆家豪状告证监会案已经落下帷幕。围绕陆家豪是“独立董事”还是“董事”及其责任承担,笔者看法是:法院判决陆为“独立董事”是不合法的;认定陆的责任承担上是过重的。

The curtain of our nation's first particular case has already came down,in which the Securities Regulatory Commission was accused of unfair judgement by a 'Vase Director'named Lu Jiahao. Centering on whether Lu Jiahao was an 'Independent Director'or an 'Ordinary Director'and how much responsibility he should bear, the author maintains that the court decided Lu Jiahao was an 'independent director' was illegality,and Lu's responsibility was overburen.