期刊文献+

颈椎棘突纵切双开门扩大植骨成形术后椎管面积与神经功能改善的2年随访 被引量:8

Two year follow-up of vertebral canal area and improvement of nervous function after double door laminoplasty by slitting spinous process of cervical vertebra
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察应用颈椎棘突纵切双开门扩大植骨成形术后脊髓型颈椎病患者神经功能改善的临床疗效。方法:采用颈椎棘突纵切双开门扩大植骨成形术治疗35例脊髓型颈椎病患者,术前术后均采用JOA评分评估神经功能。结果:35例患者术后均获得26~56个月(平均40.6个月)随访。末次随访JOA评分改善率:优10例(28.6%),良13例(37.1%),一般8例(22.9%),差4例(11.4%)。JOA评分为9~17分,平均(12.6±3.5)分,与术前JOA评分情况比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。神经功能改善率为88.6%,优良率为65.7%。结论:颈椎棘突纵切双开门扩大植骨成形术对脊髓型颈椎病是一种安全有效的手术方法,患者术后椎管面积与神经功能改善状况良好,效果明显。 AIM:To observe the clinical effects of double door laminoplasty in the i mprovement of nervous function of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy by slitting spinous process of cervical vertebra. METHODS:Thirty five patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy underwent double door laminoplasty by slitting spinous process of cervical vertebra.Preoperative and postoperative nervous functions were assessed using a scoring system proposed by Japanese Orthopadic Association (JOA score). RESULTS:The follow up lasted 26 to 56 months(average follow up 40.6 months).The average JOA scores were 12.6±3.5(9-17 scores) at the lastest follow up.There were significant differences between preoperative and postoperative JOA scores(P< 0.01). Of these 35 patients,10 patients(28.6%) had excellent results,13(37.1%) good,8(22.9%) fair and 4(11.4%) poor. CONCLUSION:Double door Laminoplasty by slitting spinous process of cervical vertebra is a reliable and safe procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.It is obviously effective in the area of vertebral canal and the improvement of nervous function of patients.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2004年第5期824-825,T001,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1张伟国,许新复,施增儒.脊髓型颈椎病脊髓磁共振成像测量研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,1995,3(2):86-89. 被引量:6
  • 2Aita I, Hayashi K,Wadono Y,et al.Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1998,80(1 ):33-38.
  • 3Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K,et al.Expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy[J].Spine,1983,8 (6):693-699.
  • 4Kohno K,Kumon Y,Oka Y,et al.Evaluation of prognostic factors following enpansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy[J].Surg Neurol,1997,48 ( 2 ):237-245.
  • 5Hamburger C,Buttner A,Uhl E.The cross-sectional area of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine,1997,22 ( 17 ) :1990-1994.
  • 6Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H,et al.Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord[J].Spine,2001,26( 11 ):1238-1245.
  • 7Hosono N, Yonenobu K,Ono K.Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty[J].Spine,1996,21 (17): 1969-1973.
  • 8陈林林.影响脊髓型颈椎病前路手术疗效的因素[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1999,6(7):550-551. 被引量:8
  • 9陈其昕,陈维善,徐少文,陈正形,斯永乐.BAK在颈椎前路手术中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1999,6(9):643-646. 被引量:13
  • 10姚建华,胥少汀,季新民,时述山,李放,孙天胜.颈椎前路减压并发脊髓损伤的高危因素回顾分析[J].现代康复,2000,4(7):1012-1013. 被引量:2

共引文献54

同被引文献39

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部