期刊文献+

为“金规则”辨 被引量:3

Justifying the Golden Rule
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学界近年在对“已所不欲,勿施于人”这个中国式的“金规则”的议论中,存在不少误读、误解。择要言之,一是将“金规则”之“金”理解为“道德价值最高”;二是用“知道做不到”质疑、贬低“金规则”;三是以“不同”的存在否证“金规则”;四是认为“金规则”不适合现代社会。然而经过仔细辨析可以发现,这些其实都是不确之语。 There are remarkable wrong understanding and misunderstanding in the discussions concerning the Chinese Golden Rule, 'do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire', in recent academic discussions. To sum up, those wrong understanding and misunderstanding find their expressions in such forms: (1) considering the Golden Ride as something that has the highest moral value; (2) doubting about or even devaluing the Golden Rule with its impossibility in practice; (3) denying the Golden Rule in one way or another; (4) thinking that the Golden Rule is unfit for modern society. However, if we look into these ideas closely, we will be sure to find that they are all untrue.
作者 韩东屏
出处 《伦理学研究》 2003年第1期80-83,97,共5页 Studies in Ethics
关键词 “金规则” 辨析 道德规则 道德价值 孔子 “己所不欲 勿施于人” 儒家文化 the Golden Rule justify morality rules system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1.《管子》[M].,..
  • 2.《韩非子》[M].,..
  • 3.《论语》[M].,..
  • 4.《中庸》[M].,..
  • 5.《墨子》[M].,..
  • 6.《圣经》[M].南京:中国基督教协会,1998.第2-3页.
  • 7《商君书》.
  • 8《理想国》(柏拉图)
  • 9《尼各马科伦理学》(亚里士多德)
  • 10Rawls, John, 1972, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press.

共引文献23

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部