摘要
以重商主义为根据的政府干预理论与现代政府干预理论在干预的性质、范围、方式及针对的主要矛盾上均有着显著的区别。尤其重要的是 ,在政府失灵问题暴露出来以后 ,现代政府干预理论特别强调政府干预经济的法治化 ,并赋予了政府干预以程序化的内涵与外观。就目前各种矫正政府失灵的制度安排而言 ,其能发挥作用的前提 ,均不能不借助于程序而得以实现。行政法学中“控权”与“授权”在分野中趋于回归 ,最后必然与经济法对政府干预的分析趋于同路 。
The government intervention theory which is on the basis of mercantile system distinguishes greatly from modern government intervention theory in the character, the range, the mode and the primary contradiction of the intervention. More importantly, modern government intervention theory attaches more emphasis on the legalization of government intervention, and endows the intension and extension of government intervention in the procedure way after the exposure of the failure of the administration. As far as the arrangement of the system for the failure of the administration is concerned, the intention of the arrangement of the system can be achieved by virtue of the procedure way. Control of administration and authorization in the administrative jurisprudence will attain the regression from the separation, will go the same way with the analysis of government intervention theory by economic law, and come to the discussion about the running procedure of the government power.
出处
《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》
2004年第1期149-155,共7页
Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
政府干预
法治化
程序化
government intervention
legalization
coincidence with procedure