摘要
中国学者中最早系统论证孔子与《周易》无涉的当为钱穆。在此之前,日本学者本田成之已有此说。因此,不能说这一 著名的疑古论点没有日本汉学的影响。从马王堆帛书和郭店楚简的记载来看,否定孔子与《周易》经、传有关,显然是不能成立 的。
The opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was firstly and systematically put forward by Qian Mu. Before that, one scholar in Japan had the same saying. According to the recordings of silk books in Mawangdui and slips of bamboo for writings in the Chu Period, the opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was obviously wrong.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
2004年第2期88-93,共6页
Hebei Academic Journal