期刊文献+

歧义心理意义建构理论述论 被引量:3

On Theoretical Construction of Ambiguity Psychological Connotation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 歧义词意义建构理论关注的焦点是语境起作用的时间点和歧义词意义相对频率的作用,而歧义句意义建构理论关注的焦点是句法和语义信息在歧义句加工中的主导性问题。语言建构理论的基本观点是在阅读中如何建构一个连贯的心理表征或结构。研究歧义心理意义建构时,综合歧义词加工中的多重通达模型、选择通达模型、重排序通达模型和整合模型,综合句子加工中的自主模型和交互作用模型,综合语言理解中的建构———整合模型、结构建构框架等模型,从多侧面、多层次、多维度上解释歧义现象,对于增强歧义理论模型的解释力和预测性具有十分重要的意义。 The theoretical construction of the meaning of ambiguous words focuses on the point of time in context and the impact of relative frequency of ambiguous words while the theoretical construction of the meaning of ambiguous sentences highlights the dominant issues of syntax and semantic information in the shaping of ambiguous sentences. The basic viewpoints of language theoretical construction lie in how to build a coherent psychological token or structure. In the study of psychological meaning construction of ambiguity, the model of multiple understanding, the model of selective understanding, the model of resorting understanding and the model of conformity etc. endows the explanation and prediction of theoretical model of ambiguity with great significance.
作者 吴彦文
出处 《天水师范学院学报》 2004年第1期85-88,共4页 Journal of Tianshui Normal University
关键词 语境 歧义心理意义建构 语言理解 心理语言学 句法 英语 ambiguous words ambiguous sentences psychological meaning construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陈永明,崔耀.汉语歧义句的加工[J].心理学报,1997,29(1):2-8. 被引量:23
  • 2杨丽霞,崔耀,陈永明.工作记忆、意思相对频率与汉语歧义句的加工[J].心理科学,1999,22(3):222-225. 被引量:16
  • 3舒华 唐映红 张亚旭.汉语双音节词词汇歧义消解过程的研究[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):247-247.
  • 4张亚旭,张厚粲,舒华.汉语偏正/述宾歧义短语加工初探[J].心理学报,2000,32(1):13-19. 被引量:26
  • 5周静仪,陈少芳,宋华.中文阅读中主题与语意信息在句子加工中的作用[J].心理学报,2000,32(1):7-12. 被引量:4
  • 6[6]Van Retten C, Kutas M. Ambiguous words in context: An event - related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1987, (26): 188 -208.
  • 7[7]Simpson G B, Krueger M A. Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1991, (30):627 - 643.
  • 8[8]Sereno S C. Resolution of Lexical ambiguity: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1995, (21) :582 -595.
  • 9[9]Frazier L, Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehensions: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentence[J]. Cognitive Psychology. 1982, (14): 178 - 210.
  • 10[10]MacDond M C. lexical representations and sentence processing: an introduction[J]. Language and Cognition Processes,1997,12(2/3) :121 -136.

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈永明,崔耀.汉语歧义句的加工[J].心理学报,1997,29(1):2-8. 被引量:23
  • 2崔耀,陈永明.阅读理解中的预期推理[J].心理学报,1996,28(3):238-244. 被引量:32
  • 3冯志伟.自然语言处理中的歧义消解方法[J].语言文字应用,1996(1):55-60. 被引量:25
  • 4彭聃龄,刘松林.汉语句子理解中语义分析与句法分析的关系[J].心理学报,1993,25(2):132-139. 被引量:19
  • 5[1]Frazier L, Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 1982,14:178-210
  • 6[2]Frazier L. On comprehension sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978
  • 7[3]Frazier L, Fodor J D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 1978, 6:291-326
  • 8[4]Rayner K, Carlson M, Frazier L. The interaction of syntactic and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movement in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983, 22:358-374
  • 9[5]Rayner K, Garrod S, Perfetti C A. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 1992, 45:109-139
  • 10[6]Taraban R, McCelland J L. Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expections. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27:597-632

共引文献56

同被引文献16

  • 1陈潇.歧义句类型及认知解读的模式[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版),2004,22(6):72-75. 被引量:2
  • 2马建辉,王春会.英语结构歧义的认知研究[J].唐山师范学院学报,2006,28(4):35-36. 被引量:14
  • 3[1]Van Retten C.Ambiguous words in context:An Event-Related Potential Analysis of the Time Course of Meaning Activation[J].Journal of Memory and Language ,1987,(26).
  • 4[2]Simpson.G B. Selective Access of Homograph Meanings in Sentence Context [J].Journal of Memory and Language , 1991,(30).
  • 5[3]Sereno.S C.Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Evidence from an Eye Movement Priming Paradigm[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ,1995,(21).
  • 6[5]Frazier L. Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehensions: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentence[J].Cognitive Psychology.1982,(14).
  • 7[6]MacDond.M C.Lexical Representations and Sentence Processing: an Introduction[J].Language and Cognition Processes,1997,(12).
  • 8[7]Boland.J E. The Relationship between Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Language and Cognitive Process,1997,(4).
  • 9章艳.英语中歧义句常见的类型[J].同济大学学报,2000,(6).
  • 10[9]Radford.Transformational Grammar:A First Course[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部