期刊文献+

进展期胃癌行腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫的疗效观察 被引量:37

Effectiveness of para-aortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价进展期胃癌患者淋巴结清扫范围与生存率的关系。 方法 共施行进展期胃癌根治术 15 8例 ,其中在D2 、D2 + 或D3 的基础上再作腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫 (PALD组 )共 73例 ,未作腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫 (非PALD组 )共 85例。 2组在年龄、性别、肿瘤部位、Borrmann分型、肿瘤大小、组织学类型差异无显著性意义 ,而PALD组的侵犯深度、淋巴结转移和临床病理分期均较非PALD组更晚期。 结果 PALD组手术时间为 (2 80± 93)min ,非PALD组为 (2 4 5± 91)min(P <0 0 1)。输血量PALD组为 (6 93± 32 4 )ml,非PALD组为 (46 0± 375 )ml(P <0 0 1)。 2组均无吻合口瘘、胰瘘、腹腔脓肿及肠梗阻等并发症。除PALD组腹泻发生率较高外 ,其他并发症 2组差异无显著性意义。 2组生存曲线、平均生存期、中位生存期的差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 ) ,2组中淋巴结阴性、阳性患者的生存曲线、平均生存期、中位生存期差异亦有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 )。PALD组腹主动脉旁淋巴结阴性、阳性患者的生存曲线、平均生存期、中位生存期差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 )。 结论 腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫有助提高进展期胃癌患者生存期 ,且其病死率和并发症发生率与限制性手术并无明显差别。 Objective To assess whether any correlation exists between survival and the extent of lymph-node dissection. Methods D 2,D 2 + or D 3 radical resection was performed on 158 patients with advanced gastric cancer. Among them, 73 were subjected to para-aortic lymph node dissection, (PALD group), and the other 85 were not subjected to the operation (non-PALD group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, site of tumors, type of Borrmann and histology between the two groups. The PALD group showed more advanced diseases in term of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological stage. Results Average operation time was longer in the PALD group than in the non-PALD group[(280±93) min VS. (245±91) min, ( P <0.01)].Blood transfusion volume was (693±324) ml in the PALD group, and (460±375) ml in the non-PALD group( P <0.01). No anastomotic leaks, pancreatic fistula, abdominal abscess and ileus were observed in both groups. No significant complications were found except for a higher incidence of diarrhea in the PALD group. Significant difference was found in survival curve, mean and median survival time between the two groups. The difference in survival was also found between patients with positive and negative lymph node metastasis in the PALD and non-PALD groups. Again, there was significant difference in survival between positive and negative No. 16 lymph node in the PALD group. Conclusion Para-aortic lymph node dissection offers a significant survival benefit to curable patients with advanced gastric cancer. It is similar to limited lymphadenectomy in morbidity and mortality.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第5期375-378,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 中山大学"2 11工程"重点学科建设资助项目 (980 87)
关键词 进展期胃癌 腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术 生存率 根治术 淋巴结转移 Stomach neoplasms Lymph node excision Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Maeta M, Yamashiro H, Saito H, et al. A prospective pilot study of extended (D3) and superextended para-aortic lymphadenectomy (D4) in patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer managed by total gastrectomy. Surg, 1999,125:325-331.
  • 2Isozaki H, Okajima K, Fujii K, et al. Effectiveness of paraaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.Hepatogastroenterology,1999,46:549-554.
  • 3Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Hokita S. Extended gastric surgery: is paraaortic lymph node dissection essential for advanced gastric cancer? Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 1998,25:498-503.
  • 4Kodama I, Kofuji K, Yano S, et al. Lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy for carcinoma in the gastric cardia: clinical experience. Int Surg,1998 ,83:205-209.
  • 5Hashimoto K, Takeda J, Tanaka T, et al. Significance and actual status of the dissection of paraaortic lymph nodes in the cases with gastric cancer. Kurume Med J,1990,37:159-164.
  • 6Baba M, Hokita S, Natsugoe S, et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper-third of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology, 2000,47:893-896.
  • 7Yonemura Y, Katayama K, Kamata T,et al. Surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer with metastasis in para-aortic lymph node. Int Surg, 1991,76:222-225.
  • 8de Manzoni G, Verlato G, Guglielmi A, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. Br J Surg, 1996,83:1604-1607.
  • 9Kitamura M, Arai K, Iwasaki Y. Clinico-pathological studies and problems on para-aortic lymph node dissection--D4 dissection. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 1996,97:302-307.

同被引文献277

引证文献37

二级引证文献277

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部