摘要
由于历史的原因,英美两国的司法审查制度存在着千丝万缕的联系,但是,宪政制度的不同,却也造成了它们之间的差异。这种差异从两国司法审查的范围、程度、方法以及起诉资格的限制等方面就可以看出。然而,随着世界范围内对人权保障的逐步加深,两国的司法审查制度也呈现出相同的发展趋势,那就是建立一套范围更广、程度更深、方法更统一、限制更少的司法审查制度。
Because of the history,there exists a close relation between British and American judicial review systems.However,the different constitutionalism institution divert them.The distinctness in two judicial review systems includes scope of judicial review and its intensity,method and limits on capacity to sue.But,with the idea of protecting human right improving in the whole world,British and American judicial review systems have a same trend to make scope larger,intensity stronger,method more uniform and limits on capacity to sue smaller.
出处
《延安大学学报(社会科学版)》
2004年第1期50-54,共5页
Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
司法审查
普通法
宪政制度
司法审查的范围
司法审查的程度
司法审查的方法
起诉资格的限制
judicial review, common law, constitutionalism institution, scope of judicial review, intensity of judicial review, method of judicial review, limits on capacity to sue