期刊文献+

重温与新知:美国非法自白规则之定位 被引量:10

Review and New Knowledge: Definite Opinion on the Rule of Confession Illegally Obtained in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统上 ,将美国非法自白规则界定为严格的排除规则 ,即所谓排除加例外的模式 ,实际上是一种误解。从美国司法运作的具体情况看 ,法官对非法自白的处理实际上享有较大的自由裁量权力 ,并遵循符合任意性规则的宪法性原则。对美国非法自白规则这一新的理解 。 The traditional viewpoint that the rule of confession illegally obtained in the United States is a strong exclusionary rule of confession, namely a typical exclusionary rule of confession with exception to the exclusionary rule is wrong in fact. As for the judicial practice in the United States, in fact, the judges are entitled to the discretion to exclude or admit confession illegally obtained under the constitutional principles according with the voluntary rule. The change for the viewpoint about the rule of confession illegally obtained in the United States is favorable of rational design of our rule of confession and evidence illegally obtained.
作者 牟军
机构地区 云南大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期187-193,共7页 Modern Law Science
关键词 美国 非法自白规则 排除规则 自由裁量权力 非法证据 法律效力 confession illegally obtained voluntariness due process
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Peter Mirfield, Silence, Confessions and Improperly Obtained Evidence, Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1997, P337.
  • 2Duraway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200(1979).
  • 3Peter Mirfield, Silence, Confession and Improperly Obtained Evidence, Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1997, P337.
  • 4People v. Rogers, 52 N. Y. 2d 527, 421 N. E. 2d 491(1981).
  • 5McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943). Mallory v.United States, 354 U.S. 449(1957).
  • 6McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 322 at P. 349 (1943).
  • 7State v. Folkes, 174 Dre. 568, 150 P 2d 17 (1944), State v.Zukanskas, 132 Conn. 450, 45A. 2d 289 (1945).
  • 8Omnibus Crime Act 1968, 18 U. S. C. § 3501.
  • 9Miranda v. United States, 384, U. S 436. (1966).
  • 10Miranda v. United States, 384, U.S. 436, at 516-517(1966).

同被引文献87

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部