期刊文献+

初步确定:逮捕的证明标准 被引量:3

Explorative Discussion About the Standard of Testification For Arrestment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证明标准是逮捕条件中的核心问题 ,但我国的刑事诉讼法及相关司法解释均未对这一问题作出明确的界定。笔者比较国内外不同的观点 ,提出以“经查证属实的证据足以初步确定犯罪嫌疑人已实施了犯罪”作为逮捕的证明标准的主张 ,简称“初步确定”观点。 Standard of testification is a core problem in arrestment conditions. However in our country's criminal procedure law and relevant judicial interpretations, this problem is not clearly defined. Compared with home and foreign different viewpoints, the author puts forward the views that the standard of testification for arrestment should be the evidence which has been checked and found to be true, sufficient for preliminary ascertainment of the suspects' commitment of crimes, briefly called the view of 'preliminary ascertainment'.
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2004年第2期90-91,94,共3页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 逮捕条件 证明标准 刑事诉讼法 犯罪嫌疑人 犯罪事实 审查逮捕工作 Arrestment standard of testification preliminary ascertainment be checked and found to be true
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献16

  • 1李忠诚.对“有证据证明有犯罪事实”的理解[J].人民检察,1996(9):42-43. 被引量:3
  • 2李光伟.糖尿病一级预防任重道远[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(2):91-92. 被引量:42
  • 3[3]An arrest is the taking of a person into custody so that he may be held to answer for the commission of an offense. While all arrests involve restraint of a person's liberty,not all restraints fall under the category of an arrest.
  • 4[5]Ker v. California,374 U.S.23,1964
  • 5[6]Page 34,Criminal Procedure and Evidence by Rolando del Carmen
  • 6[7]Schnechloth v. Bustamonte,412 U.S. 218,1973.
  • 7樊崇义.《刑事诉讼法学》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1996年版.第311页.
  • 8崔敏.《刑事证据理论研究综述》[M].中国人民公安大学出版社,1990年版.第48页.
  • 9金明焕.《比较检察制度概论》,中国检察出版社,1993年版,第205页.
  • 10钱荣立等.世纪的糖尿病防治[M]河南医科大学出版社,2000.

共引文献133

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部