期刊文献+

Difference of gene expression profiles between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium by gene chip 被引量:23

Difference of gene expression profiles between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium by gene chip
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To study the difference of gene expression between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium and to screen novel associated genes in the early stage of esophageal carcinogenesis by cDNA microarray.METHODS: Total RNA was extracted with the original single step way from esophageal carcinoma, its pericancerous epithelial tissue and normal esophageal epithelium far from the tumor. The cDNA retro-transcribed from equal quantity of mRNA was labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 fluorescence functioning as probes. The mixed probes were hybridized with two pieces of BioDoor 4 096 double dot human whole gene chip. Fluorescence signals were scanned by ScanArray 3 000 laser scanner and farther analyzed by ImaGene 3.0software with the digital computer.RESULTS: (1) A total of 135 genes were screened out, in which 85 and 50 genes whose the gene expression levels (fluorescence intensity) in esophageal carcinoma were more than 2 times and less than 0.5 times respectively compared with the normal esophageal epithelium. (2) There were also total 31 genes, among then 27 and 4 whose expressions in pericancerous tissue were 2-fold up-regulated and 0.5-fold down-regulated respectively compared with normal esophageal epithelium. (3) There were 13 genes appeared simultaneously in both pericancerous epithelium and esophageal carcinoma, while another 18 genes existed in pericancerous epithelium only.CONCLUSION: With the parallel comparison among these three gene profiles, it was shown that (1). A total of 135genes, Whose expression difference manifested as fluorescence intensity were more than 2 times between esophageal carcinoma and normal esophageal epithelium,were probably related to the occurrence and development of the esophageal carcinoma. (2). The 31 genes showing expression difference more than 2 times between pericancerous and normal esophageal epithelium might be relate to the promotion of esophageal pericancerosis and its progress. The present study illustrated that by using the gene chip to detect the difference of gene expression profiles might be of benefit to the gene diagnosis, treatment and prevention of esophageal carcinoma. AIM;TO study the difference of gene expression between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium and to screen novel associated genes in the early stage of esophageal carcinogenesis by cDNA microarray. METHODS:Total RNA was extracted with the original single step way from esophageal carcinoma,its pericancerous epithelial tissue and normal esophageal epithelium far from the tumor.The cDNA retro-transcribed from equal quantity of mRNA was labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 fluorescence functioning as probes.The mixed probes were hybridized with two pieces of BioDoor 4 096 double dot human whole gene chip.Fluorescence signals were scanned by ScanArray 3 000 laser scanner and farther analyzed by ImaGene 3.0 software with the digital computer. RESULTS:(1)A total of 135 genes were screened out,in which 85 and 50 genes whose the gene expression levels (fluorescence intensity)in esophageal cardnoma were more than 2 times and less than 0.5 times respectively compared with the normal esophageal epithelium.(2)There were also total 31 genes,among then 27 and 4 whose expressions in pericancerous tissue were 2-fold up-regulated and 0,5-fold down-regulated respectively compared with normal esophageal epithelium.(3)There were 13 genes appeared simultaneously in both pericancerous epithelium and esophageal carcinoma,while another 18 genes existed in pericancerous epithelium only. CONCLUSION:With the parallel comparison among these three gene profiles,it was shown that(1).A total of 135 genes,Whose expression difference manifested as fluorescence intensity were more than 2 times between esophageal carcinoma and normal esophageal epithelium, were probably related to the occurrence and development of the esophageal carcinoma.(2).The 31 genes showing expression difference more than 2 times between pericancerous and normal esophageal epithelium might be relate to the promotion of esophageal pericancerosis and its progress.The present study illustrated that by using the gene chip to detect the difference of gene expression profiles might be of benefit to the gene diagnosis,treatment and prevention of esophageal carcinoma.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2003年第3期417-422,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Zhejiang Medical and Health Science Foundation No.2002A023
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1[1]Peng XL, Yuan HY, Xie Y, Wang HH. Experimental technique of gene engineering. HuNa Sci Tech Issue Ag Second 1998:197-199
  • 2[2]Xu SH, Mou HZ, Lu GQ, Zhu CH, Yang ZY, Gao YL, Lou HK, Liu XL, Chen Y, Yang W. Gene expression profile difference in high and low metastatic human ovarian cancer cell lines by gene chip. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002; 115:36-41
  • 3[3]Wang K, Gan L, Jeffery E, Gayle M, Gown AM, Skelly M, Nelson PS, Ng WV, Schummer M, Hood L, Mulligan J. Monitoring gene expression profile changes in ovarian carcinomas using cDNA microarra. Gene 1999; 229:101-108
  • 4[4]Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N, Bednarski DW, Schummer M, Haussler D. Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.Bioinformatics 2000; 16:906-914
  • 5[5]Ono K, Tanaka T, Tsunoda T, Kitahara O, Kihara C, Okamoto A, Ochiai K, Takagi T, Nakamura Y. Identification by cDNA microarray of genes involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2000; 60:5007-5011
  • 6[6]Zou TT, Selaru FM, Xu Y, Shustova V, Yin J, Mori Y, Shibata D, Sato F, Wang S, Olaru A, Deacu E, Liu TC, Abraham JM, Meltzer SJ. Application of cDNA microarrays to generate a molecular taxonomy capable of distinguishing between colon cancer and normal colon. Oncogene 2002; 21:4855-4862
  • 7[7]Lin YM, Furukawa Y, Tsunoda T, Yue CT, Yang KC, Nakamura Y. Molecular diagnosis of colorectal tumors by expression profiles of 50 genes expressed differentially in adenomas and carcinomas. Oncogene 2002; 21:4120-4128
  • 8[8]Sepulveda AR, Tao H, Carloni E, Sepulveda J, Graham DY, Peterson LE. Screening of gene expression profiles in gastric epithelial cells induced by Helicobacter pylori using microarray analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16 (Suppl 2): 145-157
  • 9[9]Zhou Y, Gwadry FG, Reinhold WC, Miller LD, Smith LH, Scheft U, Liu ET, Kohn KW, Pommier Y, Weinstein JN. Transcriptional regulation of mitotic genes by camptothecin-induced DNA damage: microarray analysis of dose- and time-dependent effects. Cancer Res 2002; 62:1688-1695
  • 10[10]Iizaka M, Furukawa Y, Tsunoda T, Akashi H, Ogawa M, Nakamura Y. Expression profile analysis of colon cancer cells in response to sulindac or aspirin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;292:498-512

同被引文献199

引证文献23

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部