期刊文献+

试论知识产权的私权属性及其公权化趋向 被引量:205

On the Intellectual Property's Private Right Nature and Its Publicizing Trend
原文传递
导出
摘要 知识经济时代的知识产权正由传统意义上的私权蜕变为一种私权公权化的权利。私权性是知识产权的本质属性,知识产权私权的公权化趋向乃是建构知识产权法的利益平衡机制、保障知识产权人的专有权、实现知识产权法的公共利益价值之所需。知识产权私权的公权化表明知识产权兼具有私权属性和公权属性,二者对立又统一。其中,私权属性是矛盾的主要方面,公权属性是矛盾的次要方面。知识产权私权的公权化意味着在加强知识产权私权保护的同时应当重视社会公共利益,以防止私权保护不足或私权保护过度从而破坏知识产权人利益和社会公共利益的平衡。知识产权法在民法体系中具有相对独立地位。 In the era of knowledge- based economy, intellectual property is being transformed from private right in traditional meaning into private right together with its tendency of public right. The nature of private right is the essential nature thereof. The tendency of public right is necessary to construct the interests balanced mechanism of intellectual property law, to assure the exclusive right of the owner of the intellectual property, and to realize the common goods value of intellectual property law. The tendency of public right of intellectual property is to show that intellectual property has the nature of private right and public right, the two set against as well as unify each other. The nature of private right constitutes the principal aspect of the contradiction, while the nature of public right belongs to the less important aspect of the contradiction. The tendency of public right also means that it should attach importance to common goods while strengthening the protection of private right of intellectual property, so as to prevent private rights from being protected insufficiently or excessively thus destroying the balance between the interests of the owner of intellectual property and common goods. Based on the introspection of the nature of intellectual property, intellectual property law should has a relatively independent status in the system of civil law.
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期61-68,共8页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Xiaoqing Feng & Frank Huang Xianfeng, Internationalization and Local Elements: The Development of the Chinese Copyright Law, 49 of the Copyright Society of the USA 917-947(2002).
  • 2Unites States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc, 334 U S 131 (1948).
  • 3Twentieth Century Music Corp. v Aiken, 422 U S 151, 156 (1975).
  • 4H R Rep. No 222, 60th, Cong, 2d Sess7 (1909).
  • 5冯晓青.[D].,.
  • 6郑成思.《知识产权论》:第2版[M].法律出版社,2001年.第2页.
  • 7袁泳.知识产权法与技术、文化创新[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,34(5):99-107. 被引量:52
  • 8乔生.我国知识产权保护的现状与思考[J].法商研究(中南财经政法大学学报),2002,19(3):120-126. 被引量:18
  • 9芦琦.论“自主知识产权”及其法律保护[J].上海市政法管理干部学院学报,2000,15(2):47-52. 被引量:18
  • 10.《马克思恩格斯选集》第46卷(上)[M].人民出版社,1979年版.第454页.

二级参考文献16

共引文献93

引证文献205

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部