再论意识流文学的本质是心理真实——兼评秦剑、周秀荣的“性本能规定”说

A Second Treatise that the Fundamental Nature of Stream-of-Consciousness Literature is Psychological Verity ——And a Critique by Historical Facts and Academic Theory on the Idea of “Sexual Instinct Premise" of Qing Jian and Zhou

意识流文学的生成远在弗洛伊德的精神分析理论形成之前 ,“弗洛伊德的精神分析理论对意识流文学的生成具有决定性的意义”的说法是常识性错误。意识流文学和精神分析有本质的区别。西方意识流小说理论家认为意识流文学的本质是心理真实 ,西方意识流小说的代表人物拒绝将意识流纳入精神分析轨道 ,乔伊斯和精神分析派在学理上两不相容。因此 ,把“性本能”作为意识流文学前提的“意识流文学性本能规定”说是一个无视事实、违背学理的虚假命题。“意识流”在上世纪 2 0年代和 80年代两次涌入中国 ,“性本能”论或谈性色变都是错误的。正确认识意识流文学的本质在我国有着现实和长久的意义。

Stream-of-consciousness literature came into being far earlier than Freudianism was founded. The statement that Freudian psychoanalysis was decisive for the forthcoming of stream-of-consciousness literature was wrong by common sense. They are different in nature. In the domain of stream-of-consciousness literature, western theoreticians hold that the fundamental nature of stream-of-consciousness literature is psychological verity and the representative novelists hold it off from psychoanalysis. By doctrinal dispute, Joyce was irreconcilable with psychoanalysis. Therefore 'sex instinct premises stream-of-consciousness literature' is a false proposition. 'Stream of consciousness' swarmed into China in the second eighth decades of the last century. Both are wrong 'Sex instinct is determinant' and fear at mere mention of sexuality. In our country, it is practically and for long significant to recognize the nature of stream-of-consciousness literature.