期刊文献+

Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? 被引量:4

Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To perform a review of patients with colorectal cancer to a community hospital and to compare the risk-adjusted survival between patients managed in general surgical units versus a colorectal unit.METHODS: The study evaluated all patients with colorectal cancer referred to either general surgical units or a colorectal unit from 1/1996 to 6/2001.These results were compared to a historical control group treated within general surgical units at the same hospital from 1/1989 to 12/1994. A KaplanMeier survival analysis compared the overall survivals (allcause mortality) between the groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the influence of a number of independent variables on survival. These variables included age, ASA score, disease stage, emergency surgery,adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, disease location, and surgical unit.RESULTS: There were 974 patients involved in this study.There were no significant differences in the demographic details for the three groups. Patients in the colorectal group were more likely to have rectal cancer and Stage T cancers,and less likely to have Stage Ⅱ cancers. Patients treated in the colorectal group had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival when compared with the general surgical group and the historical control group (56 % versus 45 % and 40 % respectively, P<0.01). Survival regression analysis identified age, ASA score, disease stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment in a colorectal unit (Hazards ratio: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.84, P =0.0005), as significant independent predictors of survival.CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there may be a survival advantage for patients with colon and rectal cancers being treated within a specialist colorectal surgical unit. AIM:To perform a review of patients with colorectal cancer to a community hospital and to compare the risk-adjusted survival between patients managed in general surgical units versus a colorectal unit. METHODS:The study evaluated all patients with colorectal cancer referred to either general surgical units or a colorectal unit from 1/1996 to 6/2001.These results were compared to a historical control group treated within general surgical units at the same hospital from 1/1989 to 12/1994.A Kaplan- Meier survival analysis compared the overall survivals (all- cause mortality) between the groups.A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the influence of a number of independent variables on survival.These variables included age,ASA score,disease stage,emergency surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy,disease location,and surgical unit. RESULTS:There were 974 patients involved in this study. There were no significant differences in the demographic details for thethree groups.Patients in the colorectal group were more likely to have rectal cancer and Stage Ⅰ cancers, and less likely to have Stage Ⅱ cancers.Patients treated in the colorectal group had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival when compared with the general surgical group and the historical control group (56 % versus 45 % and 40 % respectively,P<0.01).Survival regression analysis identified age,ASA score,disease stage,adjuvant chemotherapy,and treatment in a colorectal unit (Hazards ratio:0.67;95 % CI:0.53 to 0.84,P =0.0005),as significant independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION:The results suggest that there may be a survival advantage for patients with colon and rectal cancers being treated within a specialist colorectal surgical unit.
机构地区 Department of Surgery
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2003年第5期961-964,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 结直肠癌 外科治疗 手术方式 存活率 并发症 危险因子 Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Colorectal Neoplasms Colorectal Surgery Comparative Study Female Hospitals, Community Hospitals, Teaching Humans Male Middle Aged Surgery Survival Rate Treatment Outcome Western Australia
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC. Surgeon related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 227:157-167
  • 2[2]Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Saybel D,Kizer KW, Aust JB, Bell RH, Chang V, Demakis J, Faleri PJ, Gibbs JO, Graver F, Hammermeister K, McDonald G, Passaro E, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations. Results from the VA national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 1999; 230:414-432
  • 3[3]Singh KK, Barry MK, Ralston P, Henderson MA, McCormick JS,Walls AD, Auld CD. Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by nonspecialist surgeons. Br J Surg 1997;84:343-347
  • 4[4]NHMRC. Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. 1999
  • 5[5]Platell C. A community-based hospital experience with colorectal cancer. Aust NZ J Surg 1997; 67:420-423
  • 6[6]Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 1995; 345:1265-1270
  • 7[7]Matthews HR, Powell DJ, McConkey CC. Effects of the result of surgical experience on the results of resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986; 73:621-623
  • 8[8]McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. Br Med J 1991;302:1501-1505
  • 9[9]Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and the National Cancer Policy Board. Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of health care quality. Washington: Institute of Medicine 2000
  • 10[10]Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer BS. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 2001;130:415-422

同被引文献75

  • 1Jing Yi~1 Zhi-Wei Wang~1 Hui Cang~1 Yu-Ying Chen~1 Ren Zhao~2 Bao-Ming Yu~2 Xue-Ming Tang~1 1 Department of Cell Biology,2 Department of Surgery,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Second Medical University,Shanghai 200025,China.p16 gene methylation in colorectal cancers associated with Duke's staging[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2001,7(5):722-725. 被引量:21
  • 2周岩冰,江海涛,周晓斌,张建立,王海波,毛伟征,丁连安,张敬智,于冠君.直肠癌手术的质量控制[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2006,42(2):95-98. 被引量:6
  • 3Emmeline Nugent,Paul Neary.Rectal cancer surgery: volume–outcome analysis[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2010 (12)
  • 4Harriett Purves M.P.H.,Ricardo Pietrobon M.D., Ph.D.,Sheleika Hervey M.D.,Ulrich Guller M.D., M.H.S.,William Miller M.D., Ph.D.,Kirk Ludwig M.D..Relationship Between Surgeon Caseload and Sphincter Preservation in Patients With Rectal Cancer[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2005 (2)
  • 5Basili G,,Lorenzetti L,Biondi G,et al.Colorectal cancer in theelderly.Is there a role for safe and curative surgery. RoyAustralas Colle Surg . 2008
  • 6Andrén-Sandberg A,Neoptoloemos JP.Resection for pancreaticcancer in the new millennium. Pancreatology . 2002
  • 7Anwar S,Fraser S,Hill J.Surgical specialization and training-its relation to clinical outcome for colorectal cancer surgery. JEval Clin Pract . 2010
  • 8Hall BL,Hsiao EY,Majercik S,et al.The impact of surgeonspecialization on patient mortality examination of a continuousherfindahl-hirschman index. Annals of Surgery . 2009
  • 9Martínez-Ramos D,,Escrig-Sos J,Miralles-Tena JM,et al.Influence of surgeon specialization upon the results of coloncancer surgery.Usefulness of propensity scores. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas . 2008
  • 10Brnnstrm F,Jestin P,Matthiesen P,et al.Surgeon andhospital-related risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorec Dis . 2010

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部