论虚假陈述侵权损害赔偿之因果关系

A trial dissertation of the theoretical defect and a dissertion of relationship

《最高人民法院关于审理证券市场因虚假陈述引发的民事赔偿案件的若干规定》(以下简称《规定》)对虚假陈述的归责问题做出了较为详尽的解释,但对虚假陈述侵权行为与损害产生之间因果关系的认定似乎存在不妥之处,本文试图从民事侵权损害赔偿之因果关系理论、证券市场客观情况以及《规定》本身矛盾之处论述证券市场虚假陈述损害赔偿之因果关系问题。

The regulation^1 gives a detailed explanation to the imputation of the mendacious statement,but some inappropriateness seems to exist in cognizance of the cause and effect relationship between the harm-engendering consequence and the tortuous mendacious statement.This article makes a trial dissertion of the relationship^2 in the securitics business through the civil theory of the relationship^2,the external circumstances of the securities business,as well as the inconsistence of the regulation^1.Notes:Regulation^1 some regulations in the inquisition of the civil compensation cases caused by mendacious statement in the securities business issues by the supreme court.Relationship^2 the cause and effect relationship between the compensation and tortuous mendacious statement.