期刊文献+

JET and the Physics Basis of ITER

JET and the Physics Basis of ITER
下载PDF
导出
摘要 JET has made unique contributions to the physics basis of ITER by virtue ofits ITER-like geometry, large plasma size and D-T capability. The paper discusses recent JET resultsand their implications for ITER in the areas of standard ELMy H-mode, D-T operation and advancedtokamak modes. In ELMy H-mode the separation of plasma energy into core and pedestal contributionsshows that core confinement scales like gyroBohm transport. High triangularity has a beneficialeffect on confinement and leads to an integrated plasma performance exceeding the ITER Q =10reference case. A revised type I ELM scaling predicts acceptable ELM energy losses for ITER, whileprogress in physics understanding of NTMs shows how to control them in ITER. The D-T experiments of1997 have validated ICRF scenarios for heating ITER/a reactor and identified ion minority schemes(e.g. (~3He)DT) with strong ion heating. They also show that the slowing down of alpha particles isclassical so that the self-heating by fusion alphas should cause no unexpected problems. With thePellet Enhanced Performance mode of 1988, JET has produced the first advanced tokamak mode, withpeaked pressure profiles sustained by reversed magnetic shear and strongly reduced transport. Morerecently, LHCD has provided easy tuning of reversed shear and reliable access to ITBs. Improvedphysics understanding shows that rational g-surfaces play a key role in the formation anddevelopment of ITBs. The demonstration of real time feedback control of plasma current and pressureprofiles opens the path towards fully controlled steady-state tokamak plasmas. JET has made unique contributions to the physics basis of ITER by virtue ofits ITER-like geometry, large plasma size and D-T capability. The paper discusses recent JET resultsand their implications for ITER in the areas of standard ELMy H-mode, D-T operation and advancedtokamak modes. In ELMy H-mode the separation of plasma energy into core and pedestal contributionsshows that core confinement scales like gyroBohm transport. High triangularity has a beneficialeffect on confinement and leads to an integrated plasma performance exceeding the ITER Q =10reference case. A revised type I ELM scaling predicts acceptable ELM energy losses for ITER, whileprogress in physics understanding of NTMs shows how to control them in ITER. The D-T experiments of1997 have validated ICRF scenarios for heating ITER/a reactor and identified ion minority schemes(e.g. (~3He)DT) with strong ion heating. They also show that the slowing down of alpha particles isclassical so that the self-heating by fusion alphas should cause no unexpected problems. With thePellet Enhanced Performance mode of 1988, JET has produced the first advanced tokamak mode, withpeaked pressure profiles sustained by reversed magnetic shear and strongly reduced transport. Morerecently, LHCD has provided easy tuning of reversed shear and reliable access to ITBs. Improvedphysics understanding shows that rational g-surfaces play a key role in the formation anddevelopment of ITBs. The demonstration of real time feedback control of plasma current and pressureprofiles opens the path towards fully controlled steady-state tokamak plasmas.
机构地区 Kapellengartenstr.
出处 《Plasma Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2004年第1期2109-2122,共14页 等离子体科学和技术(英文版)
关键词 fusion experiment JET high confinement regime ELMy H-mode advanced tokamakscenario D-T experiments physics basis of ITER fusion experiment JET high confinement regime ELMy H-mode advanced tokamakscenario D-T experiments physics basis of ITER
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1[1]Rebut P H, Keen B E. Fusion Technol., 1987, 11:13
  • 2[2]Keilhacker M, et al. Nucl. Fusion, 2001, 41:1925
  • 3[3]ITER Physics Basis, Nucl. Fusion, 1999, 39:2368
  • 4[4]Pamela J. in Fusion Energy 2002 (Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Lyon, 2002), IAEA, Vienna (2003)CD-ROM file OV/1-4
  • 5[5]Keilhacker M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A ,1999, 357:415
  • 6[6]JET Team. in Fusion Energy 1998 (Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Yokohama, 1998), Vol. 2, IAEA, Vienna (1999) 473
  • 7[7]Keilhacker M, JET Team. Plasma Phys. Control.Fusion, 1999, 41:1
  • 8[8]Thomsen K, et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,2002, 44: A429
  • 9[9]Cordey J G, et al. Nucl. Fusion, 2003, 43:670
  • 10[10]Lomas P. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 2000,42:B115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部