期刊文献+

任务的呈现方式对孤独症儿童误念理解的影响 被引量:10

Influence of Animation on Autistic Children's False Belief Understanding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨一种更适于测试孤独症儿童误念理解能力的方法。方法 :2 (呈现方式 )× 2 (被试类型 )设计 ,采用经典误念任务 ,使用计算机多媒体动画呈现方式与传统图片 -实物呈现方式 ,分别测试2 0名孤独症儿童和言语能力 (PPVT -R)匹配的正常儿童。结果 :呈现方式的主效应非常显著 (P <0 0 0 1) ,动画呈现方式使正常儿童和孤独症儿童的误念理解成绩都有提高 ,孤独症儿童的提高更大。结论 :孤独症儿童的误念理解能力在误念任务的传统呈现方式之下可能被低估了。充分考虑孤独症认知缺陷的多样性 ,使用恰当的任务方式 ,可能会更真实地反映他们的心理理论发展水平。 Objective:To investigate an effective paradigm to test false belief understanding for the Autism. Method:By comparing the multimedia animation presentation and the traditional presentation, 20 autistic children's false belief understanding was analyzed as well as the normal children's.Results:Animation presentation was really helpful to both groups, especially for the children with autism. The performance might be underestimated due to the application of the traditional presentation in false belief tasks.Conclusion:The autistic children's theory of mind can be measured much closer to the truth if the more apt tasks are considered.
作者 苏彦捷 王恪
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期147-150,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 教育部人文社会科学十五规划项目 0 1JAXLX0 1 4 教育部科学技术重点项目 批准号 :0 2 1 70
关键词 发展心理学 心理理论 动画呈现方式 孤独症 儿童 误念理解 言语能力 developmental psychology theory of mind case-control studies animation presentation false belief understanding autism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1[2]Courchesne, E.,Townsend, J.P., Akshoomoff, N. A 1994 A new finding: Impair ment in shifting attention in autistic and cere bellarpatients. In H. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.) Atypical cognitive deficits in develop mental disorders: Implications for brain func tion(pp. 101- 137). Hillsdale, NJ; Erl baum.
  • 2[3]Dawson, G. 1996 Brief report: Neuropsychology of autism: A report on the state of the science.Journal of Autism and Development Disonders,26,pp. 179 - 184.
  • 3[4]Frith. U. 1989 Autism: Explaining the enigma.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • 4[6]Kanner, L 1943 Autistic Disturbances of affec tive contact. Nervous Child 2, pp.217- 250.
  • 5[7]Kanner, L 1971 Follow up study of eleven autis tic children originally reported in 1943.
  • 6[8]Rutter, M., & Lockyer L., 1967 a A Five to fifteen year follow- up study of infantile psy chosis: Description of sample. British Journal of Psychiatry. Vol.113, pp.1169- 1182.
  • 7[9]Schuler, A., & Prizant, B. 1985 Echolalia. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov(Eds. ), Communi cation problems in autism (pp. 163- 184 ). New York: Plenum.
  • 8[10]Tager-Flusberg, H. 1993 What language revals about the understanding of minds in children with atuism. In S.Baron- Cohen, H. Tager Flusberg, & D. J.Cohen (Eds)., Understand ing other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp.138- 157). Oxford, England: Oxford Univer sity press.
  • 9Premack D, Woodruff G.. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavior and Brain Sciences, 1978, 4: 515~526
  • 10Tager-Flusberg H, Sullivan K. A componential view of theory of mind: evidence from Williams syndrome . Cognition, 2000, 76(1): 59~90

共引文献98

同被引文献137

引证文献10

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部