期刊文献+

公司资源的“隧道效应”——来自中国上市公司的证据 被引量:41

Earnings Management to Tunnel:Evidence from China’s Listed Companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文考察了中国上市公司在控制股东谋求自己利益的前提下,其盈余管理是否与公司资源的“隧道效应”有关。我们猜测在治理结构越差和超过监管阀值动力越大的公司,进行盈余管理的激励越强烈;当隧道行为变得困难时其也减弱。我们的实证分析表明应计利润总额和行业中值调整后的应计利润(industry-median—adjusted accruals)与H/B股虚拟变量负相关,同时与下列因素表现出正相关关系:最大股东在公司的利益,高层管理人员在公司的利益以及董事会是否由CEO来控制。我们的结论显示了隧道问题在具有下列特点的公司里更为突出:一个强有力控股的股东,公司的CEO们对公司具有强烈的私人利益,董事会不是那么独立;然而当公司与境外投资者交易股票时这个问题减轻了。而且。中国资本市场发生的某些特殊事件也为我们的假设提供了支持。 This paper examines whether earnings management in China's publicly traded companies is related to controlling shareholders 'tunneling' the resources out of the firm for their own benefits.We hypothesize that the incentives to manage earnings are stronger for firms with poorer governance practices,more urgent needs to exceed regulatory thresholds;they become weaker when tunneling becomes more difficult.Our empirical evidence shows that total accruals and industry median adjusted accruals are positively correlated with the largest shareholder's inter- est in a company,top executives' interests in the company,and whether the board of director is chaired by the CEO,negatively related to H/B share dummy.Our results suggest that tunneling is more problematic in companies with powerful controlling shareholders,with CEOs that have great personal interest in the company,and with a board that is less independent,less severe for firms that have shares traded by foreign investors.Moreover,by studying several specific incidents in the context of China's capital market,we find that firms tend to manage earnings when the po- tential 'tunnding' benefits is high or when the probability of being caught is low.These results suggest that earnings management serves as one specific form of 'tunneling' in Chinese stock mar- ket.
作者 刘俏 陆洲
出处 《经济学(季刊)》 2004年第2期437-456,共20页 China Economic Quarterly
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Aharony,Joseph,Jeveons C.Lee,and T.J.Wong,“Financial Packaging of IPO Firms in China”.Journal of Accounting Research,Spring 2000,103—126.
  • 2Bae,Kee-Hong,Jun-Koo Kang,and Jin·Mo Kim.“Tunneling or value addition?Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups”,Journal of Finance,2002,forthcoming.
  • 3Bai,Chong—en,Qiao Liu,and Frank Song,“Value of Corporate Control:Evidence from China’s Distressed Firms”,working paper,2002.
  • 4Barclay,Michael J.,and Clifford G.Holdemess,“Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations”,Journal of Financial Economics,1989,25:371-395.
  • 5Berle Adolf and Gardiner Means,“The Modern Corporation and Private Property”,New York:Macmillan,1932.
  • 6Benmd.Marianne,Paras Mehta,and Sendhil Mullanianthan,“Ferreting out Tuaneling:An Application to Indian Business Gmups”,working paper 7592,National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge,2000,MA 02138.
  • 7CIaessens,Stijin,simeon Djallkov,and Larry Lang,“The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations”,Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58.
  • 8Harris,M.,and A.Ravvlv,“Corporate Control Contests and Capital Structure”,Journal of Economics,1988,20:55—86.
  • 9Jensen Michael C,“Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow,Corporate Finance,and Takeovers”,American Economic Review,1986,76:323-350.
  • 10Jensen,Michael C.and Richard,S.Rubaek,“The Market for Corporate Comrol:The Scientific Evidence”.Journal of Financial Economics,1983,11:5—50.

同被引文献567

引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部