期刊文献+

“2+2”发展性教师教学评价初探

An Exploration into the "Two Plus Two" Developmental Assessment of the Teachers' Teaching Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前 ,我国中小学教师教学评价存在评价主体单一 ,评价目的发生偏差 ,评价方式形式化 ,重视效果评价等问题。这给教师的发展设置了障碍 ,如何提高教师教学评价质量成为急待解决的问题。“2 +2”发展性教师教学评价提倡“教师互评” ,注重“教师自评”和“师生共勉”等 ,这给我们以很大的启发 ,不失为促进教师和学生发展的良好途径。 At present, there are some problems: the evaluating corpus are simple, the purpose of the assessment is changed, the way of the assessment is frigid, and the results are paid too much attention etc, which exists in the teachers' teaching assessment of the middle school and the primary school in our country. As set barrier to the teachers' progress, so how to improve the qualification of the teachers' teaching assessment becomes urgent. The 'two plus two' teachers' teaching assessment, which is designed to promote the teachers' evolution, provokes that 'the teachers should evaluate each other', it shows great stress on 'the teachers' self-evaluation', and pays great attention on 'the teachers and the students' encouragement with each other', and so on. As enlightened us greatly, so it can be regarded as a very good method to promote the teachers and the students to progress themselves.
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2004年第1期84-86,共3页 Journal of Yibin University
关键词 发展性 教师教学评价 Developmental the assessment of teachers' teaching process
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1马卡连柯 刘长松 杨慕之译.论共产主义教育[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1981.280-170.
  • 2Alkin, M. C. (1980). Uses and users of evaluation. In E.L. Baker(Eel. ), Evaluating federal education programs.
  • 3Bryk, A. S. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder - based evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 17. San Francisco, CA:Jossey- Bass.
  • 4Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly,20(3), 11-40.
  • 5Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization - focused evaluation( 2ndEd. ). Newbury, CA: Sage.
  • 6Cousins, J.B.&Earl,L.M. (1992).The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4),397-418.
  • 7Fetterman, D. M. ( 1994 ). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15.
  • 8Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Empowerment evaluation and the Intemet: A synergistic relationship. Current Issues in Education[ On-line], 1 (4)
  • 9Holdaway, E. A. (1986). Making research matter. Alberta Journal of Education, 32(3) ,249-264.
  • 10Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal,27,363-391.

共引文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部