期刊文献+

概念整合运作的认知理据 被引量:103

Cognitive Foundations of Blending Processes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概念整合理论是近几年才兴起的认知语言学理论。本文试图通过探讨合成空间理论中合成空间的三种认知整合运作过程,即组合,完善,扩展,以及它们与大脑认知运作的联系,藉以说明合成空间理论有着其认知科学方面的神经认知基础与理论依据。 The conceptual blending theory is a new and developing branch of cognitive linguistics that rose just in recent years. This paper discusses three blending processes operated in the blended space, namely composition, completion and elaboration, and then examines their relationships with the corresponding cognitive working mechanisms of the human brain. Thus it is tentatively argued that the conceptual blending operation has its salient foundations on neuro-cognitive science.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 北大核心 2004年第4期9-12,共4页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 苏州大学青年基金的资助 ,项目编号 :BV10 43 14
关键词 概念整合 整合运作过程 认知理据 conceptual blending, blending processes, cognitive foundations
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Chomsky,N.Changing Perspectives on Knowledge and Use of Language [J].Theoretical Linguistic Research.Volume 1.Issue 2.1984.
  • 2Coulson,S.& T.Oakley.Blending Basics[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2000.11-3/4,175-196.
  • 3Coulson,S.Semantic Leaps:Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction [ M ].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 4Fauconnier,G.Mental Spaces:Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,1985.
  • 5Fauconnier,G.& E.Sweetser (eds.).Spaces,Worlds,and Grammar [C].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1996.
  • 6Fauconnier,G.Mappings in Thought and Language [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
  • 7Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.Conceptual Integration Network[J].Cognitive Science,1998.22/2:133-187.
  • 8Fauconnier,G.& Turner,M.Compression and Global Insight[J].Cognitive Linguistics ,2000.11-3/4:283-304.
  • 9Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.The Way We Think:Conceptual Blending andthe Mind's Hidden Complexities [M].New York:Basic Books,2002.
  • 10Grady,J.Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Intergration[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2000.11-3/4:335-345.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Holyoak, K. J. & P. Thagard. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction[J]. Cognitive Science, 1989, (13): 295-355.
  • 2Indurkhya, B.. Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.
  • 3Johnson-Laird, E N.. Mental Models[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 4Kahneman, D.. Varieties of counterfactual thinking [A]. Roese, N. J. & J. M. Olson. What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking[C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.
  • 5Schwartz, D. L. & J. B. Black. Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback[J]. Cognitive Science, 1996, (20): 457-497.
  • 6van Dijk, T. A.. Text and Context[M]. Longman, 1977.
  • 7Coulson, S.. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending [D]. UCSD Ph. D. dissertation, 1997.
  • 8Fauconnier, G.. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 9Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Blending as a central process of grammar[A]. Goldberg, A.. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language[C]. Stanford:Center for the Study of Language and Information,1996.
  • 10Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Conceptual integration networks[J]. Cognitive Science, 1998, (22/2): 133-187.

共引文献255

同被引文献683

引证文献103

二级引证文献275

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部