期刊文献+

唐宋诗风之比较 被引量:1

Tang Poetry and Song Ci Poetry: a Comparative Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 唐诗、宋诗孰优孰劣?此论古已有之。从总体上说,唐诗独步千古,但宋诗亦是唐诗之后又一高峰,其地位和影响超过元、明、清诗。宋诗无论是作家还是作品数量之巨均远胜宋词。唐诗与宋诗相较,一是时代背景不同,各得其时,各擅其美。二是美学范畴不同:唐诗崇高,具阳刚之美;宋诗优美,蕴阴柔之美。三是艺术风格不同,唐诗雄浑,而宋诗婉丽。 Which is better,Tang poetry,or Song poetry? It's been discussed long. Generally speaking,Tang poetry was unrivalled and eternal,but Song poetry was also another peak after Tang poetry. The status and influence of Song poetry greatly exceed the poems in Yuan,Ming and Qing Dynasty. Song poems surpass Song Ci far hugely regardless of the writers or quantity of the works. If we compare Tang poetry with Song poetry,we will find,due to different era and social background,each has its features. In aesthetic categories,Tang poetry is vigorous and firm,and Song poetry is gentle and beautiful. In artistic style,Tang poetry is majestic,and Song poetry is graceful and restrained.
作者 王基林
机构地区 金陵科技学院
出处 《金陵科技学院学报》 2004年第1期68-73,共6页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology
关键词 唐朝 宋朝 文学风格 比较分析 Tang poetry Song poetry style
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[3]钱钟书.宋诗选注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1994.2-3.
  • 2[4]胡云翼.宋诗选注[M].上海:商务印书馆,1935.155.
  • 3[5]严羽.沧浪诗话校释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.76.
  • 4王夫之.姜斋诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.146.
  • 5沈德潜.说诗晬语[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1979.217.
  • 6[11]刘逸生.唐诗鉴赏词典[M].上海:辞书出版社,1983.1048-1049.
  • 7[12]叶燮.清诗话[M].上海:古籍出版社,1982.605.

共引文献21

同被引文献3

  • 1[1]张涵.美学大观[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,1996.
  • 2[2]布洛.西方美学家论美和美感[M].上海:商务印馆,1980.
  • 3王基林.论中国古典诗歌的审美移情和审美距离[J].南京农专学报,1997,(1).

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部