期刊文献+

我国承销商声誉与承销服务费用关系的研究 被引量:34

An Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Underwriter's Reputation and Underwriting Fee in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 市场为高声誉承销商提供比低声誉承销商更高的承销服务费用是对承销商建立和保持市场声誉、提高承销服务质量的一种补偿和激励,因而也是确保证券发行市场有效性的一个重要机制。文章利用中国证券发行市场上的数据资料检验了我国承销商声誉与承销服务费用之间的关系,实证分析的结果显示虽然我国承销费用率与承销商声誉值正相关,但是不同声誉等级承销商之间的承销服务价格差别很小,这种状况既不利于承销商声誉资本的形成,也弱化了声誉机制对我国承销商行为的约束力,究其原因就在于我国缺乏市场化的承销服务费用率的形成机制。有鉴于此,文章认为要改变这种状况必须放松当前对承销服务费用的管制,建立市场化的承销服务价格形成机制。 The fact that the market offers much more underwriting fee to underwriters with higher reputation than to those with lower reputation is an important compensation and encouragement for underwriters to build, maintain their reputation and improve quality of underwriting service, therefore it is also an important mechanism to keep the effectiveness of the issuance market of security. This paper tests the relationship between the reputation of underwriters and underwriting fee in China by using data from China's security issuing market. The results of the empirical analysis show that, China's underwriting fee is positive in relation with the underwriters' reputation, the price difference between underwriters of different reputation rang is very little, which not only obstructs the formation of reputation capital of underwriters but also weakens the effects of reputation mechanism on the behavior of underwriters, because there is no market mechanism of underwriting fee in China. To change this situation analysed above, this paper suggests that China should deregulate fee of underwriting services in order to build market mechanism of underwriting price.
作者 刘江会
机构地区 复旦大学经济系
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期108-118,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 博士论文和中国证券业协会 2 0 0 3年度课题项目之一<中国证券市场券商信誉问题研究>的部分研究成果
关键词 认证中介 承销商声誉 承销服务费用 certifying agent underwriter's reputation underwriting fee
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Beatty R, Ritter J.Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986,15: 213-232.
  • 2Booth J,Smith R.Capital raising, underwriting and the certification process[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986,15 : 261-281.
  • 3Carter R, Manaster S.Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation[J]. Journal of Finance,1990,45:1045-1067.
  • 4Hansen R.Evaluating the cost of a new equity issue[J]. Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1986:42-55.
  • 5Hayes S.Investment banking:power structure in flux[J]. Harvard Business Review ,1971,49:136-152.
  • 6Meggision W L, K Weiss. Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings[J].Journal of Finance, 1991,46(3):879-901.
  • 7Sami Torstila. The distribution of fee within the IPO syndicate[R]. Financial Management. 2001 ,Winter Page:25-43.
  • 8磊祖荣 李波.证券公司竞争力评价方法和实证研究[J].中国证券业研究,2003,(1).
  • 9田嘉,占卫华.投资银行的声誉与IPO定价偏低关系的实证研究[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2000(4):33-36. 被引量:52

共引文献52

同被引文献449

引证文献34

二级引证文献330

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部