期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

关于英语被动结构的句法分析 被引量：1

Syntactic Analysis of English Passive
下载PDF
导出
摘要 　格理论和扩充的投射理论EPP不能对被动结构的推导动因做出完全解释;被动结构的形成与及物动词在句法层面的被动化有关;在Chomsky(1995)最简方案的框架内,运用VP嵌套理论能够对被动句式做出合理的句法解释:NP的前移是为了满足对T的强D特征核查的要求。 A full interpretation of the derivation of English passive cannot be made via Case Theory and EPP; formation of the passive construction concerns passivivation of the transitive in the syntactic level. In the framework of MP (outlined mainly in Chomsky 1995), an appropriate syntactic interpretation of this sentence type may be achieved via VP Shell Hypothesis: NP-raising is motivated to check the strong D-feature of T. 
作者 南潮
机构地区 湖北师范学院外语系
出处 《湖北师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2003年第3期74-78,共5页 Journal of Hubei Normal University（Philosophy and Social Science）
关键词 被动结构 格理论 特征核查 VP嵌套理论 passive construction case theory feature checking VP Shell Hypothesis
分类号 H314 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]Baker, Mark. Johnson, Kyle. and Roberts, Ian.1989. Passive arguments raised [ J ]. Linguistic Inquiry 20:219 - 251.
  • 2[2]Belletti, A. 1988. The case of unaccusative [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1 - 34.
  • 3[3]Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments [ A ].In E. Benedicto and J. Runner Eds. Functional Projections: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17[C]. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
  • 4[4]Borer, Hagit. 2002. The exoakeletal trilogy [ M ]. University of Southern California, CA.
  • 5[5]Burzio, L. 1986. Italian syntax: A GovernmentBinding Approach [ M ], Dordrecht: Redial.
  • 6[6]Chomsk, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [ M ]. Dordrechi,The Netherlands: Foris.
  • 7[7]Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers [M]. Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press.
  • 8[8]Chomsky, Noam. 1993. The Minimal Program for Linguistic Theory [ A ]. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 [ C ]: 1 - 52.Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • 9[9]Chormsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • 10[10]Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiry [A]:The framework. In step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik [ C ], ed. by Roeger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89 - 155. Camridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.[A] lso available as MIT Occasional Paper In Linguistics 15, MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

共引文献129

同被引文献12

  • 1[1]Belletti, A. The case of unaccusative [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19,1988:1 ～ 34.
  • 2[2]Bowers, J. Transitivity [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 20,2002:1 ～ 50.
  • 3[3]Burzio, L. Italian Syntax: A Government-binding Approach [M]. Dordrecht: Reidel,1986.
  • 4[4]Chomsky, N. Barriers [ M ]. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 11. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.
  • 5[5]Chomsky. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.
  • 6[6]Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. Principles and parameters theory [A]. In J. Jacobs, A. Von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Venemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research [ C ]. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1993: 506 ～ 569.
  • 7[7]Cook, V. & Newson, M. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction [M]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2000.
  • 8[8]Heageman, L. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
  • 9[9]Larson, R. K. On the double object construction [J]. Linguistic Inquiry19,1988:335 ～ 391.
  • 10[10]Radford, Andrew. Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction [M]. Cambridge University Press,2000.

引证文献1

湖北师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）
2003年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部