摘要
本文比较了凯恩斯主义、新古典主义和宏观行为经济学这三个学派对失业、货币政策、通货膨胀、储蓄等重要宏观经济问题的不同诠释 ,通过这种比较使我们看到 ,新崛起的宏观行为经济学为经济学界注入了一股新鲜的活力 ,它重新重视凯恩斯曾强调过的心理和社会因素的作用 ,从互惠、公平、身份、货币幻觉、损失厌恶、羊群行为角度出发 ,对许多宏观问题做了更符合实际也更令人信服的诠释 。
From the viewpoints of the Schools of Keynesian economics, Neo classical economics and Macro Behavioral economics, this paper compares the different explanations on unemployment, monetary policy, inflation, saving and the other macro economic issues. Based on such comparisons, it shows that the new rise of the Macro Behavioral economics, which focuses on the psychological and social elements over again, brought the fresh air into the modern economics. The behaviors of reciprocity, fairness, social status, money illusion, loss aversion, herding and etc. have been taken into account in the economic analysis, therefore it could explain many macro phenomena more realistically and convincingly.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期58-65,共8页
Teaching and Research