期刊文献+

美国德克萨斯州不方便法院原则的实践 被引量:1

Practice of Forum Non Convenience Doctrine in Texas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不方便法院原则是美国联邦普通法的一项重要原则。美国最高法院在实践中建立了灵活的不方便法院原则。德克萨斯州在十九世纪末期就有不方便法院原则相类似的实践。在 1990年的CastroAlfaro一案中 ,德克萨斯州最高法院在非法致死和人身伤害侵权领域里拒绝适用不方便法院原则。但此后不久 ,德克萨斯州议会就通过立法 ,承认了不方便法院原则可以适用于非法致死和人身伤害侵权诉讼领域。 The doctrine of forum non convenience is a basic principle of American common law. The Supreme Court of the United States established flexible the forum non convenience doctrine in practice. Texas had the similar practice of forum non convenience doctrine in the late nineteenth century. The Supreme Court of Texas rejected the forum non convenience doctrine in the field of personal injury and unlawful death in 1990 Castro Alfaro case. But in the late, the congress of Texas adopted the law and admitted the forum non convenience doctrine in the field of personal injury and unlawful death.
作者 徐伟功
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2004年第2期63-67,共5页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 美国 德克萨斯州 不方便法院原则 Castro Alfaro案 人身伤害侵权行为 非法致死行为 管辖权 The doctrine of forum non convenience Castro Alfaro case Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]Russell J. Weintraub, Commentary on The Conflict of Law. 3rd. edn. 1986.
  • 2[2]Paxton Blair, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in Anglo- American Law. 29, Colum. L. Rev. 1,1929.
  • 3[3]Michael T. Manzi, Dow Chemical Company v. Castro Alaro: The Demise of Forum Non Conveniens In Texas And One Less Barrier To International Tort Litigation, Fordham International Law Journal, 1990/1991.
  • 4[4]Bill C. Anderson, Dow Chemical Company v. Castro Alaro: Forum Non Conveniens- Now Isn' t That Conveniens? Baylor Law Review,Spring, 1990.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部