3Flores-Mir C, Ayeh A, Goswani A, et al. Skeletal and dental chan- ges in Class Ⅱ division 1 malocelusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review. Angle Orthod, 2007,77 (2) :376-381.
4Barnett GA, Higgins DW, Major PW, et al. hnmediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class Ⅱ division 1 maloeclusion. Angle Orthod, 2008,78(2): 361-369.
5Petrovie A, Stutzmann J, Lavetgoe J, et al. Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a funetional appliance?, Int J Orthod, 1991,29(1/2) :3-8.
6Mahngren O, Omblus J, Hagg U, et al. Trealment with an orthope- dic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth pe- riods. A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1987,91 (2) :143-151.
7Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class Ⅱ eorrection in Herbst appli- ance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod, 1982, 82(2) :104-113.
8Pancherz H, Vertical dentofacial changes during Herhst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J, 1982,15 (Suppl) : 189-196.
9Lai M, McNamara JA Jr. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod, 1998,4( 1 ) :46-58.
10Hansen K, Pancherz H, Petersson A. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the eraniomandibular system with special refer- ence to the TMJ. Eur J Orthod, 1990,12 (3) :244-253.
