制约政策价值的瓶颈及其表现

The Bottleneck Restricting Policy valuse and 5 Symptoms

在国内的政策理论工作者、特定政策的制定者和研究者之间,没有形成围绕制定高价值政策这一共同目标相互支撑、优势互补的机制和方法论,这是制约政策价值的瓶颈。这一瓶颈表现为五大隔阂(gaps):(1)由于政策学理论没有提供一套符合逻辑与可操作的高价值政策制定程序,使得政策学理论对特定政策的制定缺乏指导性,即政策制定理论要求和现实政策制定之间存在隔阂,政策理论工作者和特定政策的制定者各行其是;(2)同理,由于政策理论缺乏一套围绕制定高价值政策的研究思路和方法,政策理论对特定政策的研究也同样缺乏指导性,政策理论中对研究的要求和实际政策研究之间也存在巨大的落差和隔阂;(3)政策学科中未能提供思路符合逻辑、过程可操作、科学上可考核、方法合理的政策制定和研究方法,其学科地位得不到自然科学学科的认同,导致自然科学研究与政策研究之间的隔阂;(4)当众多的政策研究者按自己的受教育背景和思路来进行所谓的“政策研究”,则研究注重了对科研一般规律的把握,缺乏对政策研究特殊规律的重视,使得研究和政策之间竖起了一道鸿沟;(5)由于缺乏围绕共同目标优势互补的协调机制,也缺乏被公认的科学、合理、逻辑、可操作政策制定和研究配套的思路、程式和方法,政策制定者和政策研究者遵循各自的角色规范,?

This paper emphasized that a common goal to make high valued polic ie s has not been shaped among policy theorists,policy makers and researchers in C hina.Therefore,the three parties lack a mechanism to support one another aroun d this common goal.These shaped the bottleneck restricting policy values.5 Sy mptoms of this bottleneck are analyzed in China.First,policy theory does not p resent its supervision for specific policy making.It means that there exists a gap betwwen policy theory(theorists)and policy making(makers).Second,polic y theory also does not present its supervision for specific policy researches.T here exists a gap between policy theory(theorists)and policy researches(resea rchers).Third,the scientific status of current policy theory is not acknowled ged by natural sciences.Fourth,researches and policy are thought as two totall y different businesses.Fifth,policy makers and researchers do things in their own ways.