期刊文献+

弗洛伊德与马克思——关于弗洛伊德学说与马克思理论比较中的几个问题 被引量:1

Freud and Marx ——A Few Issues in the Comparison between Freud and Marx
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为两种关于人生、社会与历史的总体观念和解释模式 ,弗洛伊德的学说与马克思的理论形成了潜在的对话关系 ,这为对二人进行联系比较提供了可能。西方学术界结合弗洛伊德与马克思大致有从外到内的三种模式 :方法与命题比较、原理置换和深层学术融合。二十世纪结合弗洛伊德与马克思的大多数尝试存在着一边倒的情况 ,即偏向于用弗洛伊德的某些概念、命题去比照、置换马克思的基本原理 ,把马克思弗洛伊德化。文章认为 ,研究弗洛伊德与马克思的关系 ,需要正视弗洛伊德的学说与马克思的理论潜在的对话关系 ,从思想史的联系中考察两者的碰撞及得失。 As two different general concepts and patterns of i nt erpretation concerning life, society and history, Freudian theory and Marxist th eory set up a potential relationship of dialogue, which makes a comparative stud y between the two possible. From the outside to the inside, there are roughly th ree modes in comparing Freud with Marx in western academia: comparison of method s and propositions, substitution of principles, and academic integration on the deeper layer. Most comparative studies between Freud and Marx in the 20 th centur y are overwhelmingly one-sided, i.e., they tend to Freudianize Marx, using some of the Freudian concepts and propositions to contrast and substitute the basic p rinciples of Marx. This paper believes that it is important to face the potentia l relationship of dialogue between Freudian and Marxist theories in studying the two, and try to examine their clashes and gains and losses from their relations in the history of ideologies.
作者 汪正龙
机构地区 南京大学中文系
出处 《南京师范大学文学院学报》 2004年第1期11-17,共7页 Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词 弗洛伊德 马克思 结合 比较 置换 Freud. Marx, integration, comparison, substitute
  • 相关文献

同被引文献11

  • 1Chen, Chien-Cheng and A Su-Fen Chiu ( 2008 ) "An Integrative Model Linking Supervisor Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior", Journal of Business Psychology 23: 1-10.
  • 2Daniels, Major Chip ( 2005 ) "Making Values-Based, Mission-Focused Decisions, " Leader to Leader, Fall Supplement 1, Vol. 2005 : 48-59.
  • 3Farley, Lisa ( 2007 ), "The "Shadowy Underside" of Learning History", The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 29: 423-440.
  • 4Muris, Peter ( 2006 ) "Freud was Right... About the Origins of Abnormal Behavior", Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, February 2006: 1-12.
  • 5冷铁勋.对公众与公共决策的认识误区及矫正对策[M]//“阳光政府与公民社会建设”一国两制文库.澳门:理工学院一国两制研究中心出版,2010.
  • 6Heywood, Andrew. Politics[M].张立鹏,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 7[美]弗洛伊德.弗洛伊德心理哲学[M].杨韶刚,等.译,九州岛:日本九州岛出版社,2006.
  • 8孙贵林,段黎明.新弗洛伊德学派对弗洛伊德人格理论的改造[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2):37-39. 被引量:2
  • 9于淼.弗洛伊德无意识创造力理论及现象学方法论释义[J].医学与哲学(A),2010,31(5):9-11. 被引量:3
  • 10汪志祥.强化员工素质、道德和使命提升企业业绩探析[J].现代商贸工业,2010,22(17):166-167. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部