摘要
作为两种关于人生、社会与历史的总体观念和解释模式 ,弗洛伊德的学说与马克思的理论形成了潜在的对话关系 ,这为对二人进行联系比较提供了可能。西方学术界结合弗洛伊德与马克思大致有从外到内的三种模式 :方法与命题比较、原理置换和深层学术融合。二十世纪结合弗洛伊德与马克思的大多数尝试存在着一边倒的情况 ,即偏向于用弗洛伊德的某些概念、命题去比照、置换马克思的基本原理 ,把马克思弗洛伊德化。文章认为 ,研究弗洛伊德与马克思的关系 ,需要正视弗洛伊德的学说与马克思的理论潜在的对话关系 ,从思想史的联系中考察两者的碰撞及得失。
As two different general concepts and patterns of i nt erpretation concerning life, society and history, Freudian theory and Marxist th eory set up a potential relationship of dialogue, which makes a comparative stud y between the two possible. From the outside to the inside, there are roughly th ree modes in comparing Freud with Marx in western academia: comparison of method s and propositions, substitution of principles, and academic integration on the deeper layer. Most comparative studies between Freud and Marx in the 20 th centur y are overwhelmingly one-sided, i.e., they tend to Freudianize Marx, using some of the Freudian concepts and propositions to contrast and substitute the basic p rinciples of Marx. This paper believes that it is important to face the potentia l relationship of dialogue between Freudian and Marxist theories in studying the two, and try to examine their clashes and gains and losses from their relations in the history of ideologies.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
2004年第1期11-17,共7页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词
弗洛伊德
马克思
结合
比较
置换
Freud. Marx, integration, comparison, substitute