民事非法证据排除问题初探——兼评《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第68条

On the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Civil Litigation ——Review on Article 68 in Regulations of Evidence in Civil Litigation

对民事非法证据的排除 ,反映了民事诉讼对程序权利和宪法权利问题的关注正日益上升。而民事非法证据排除的具体内容 ,则与一国的诉讼体制和诉讼传统密切相关。作者认为 ,首先 ,为了实现程序公正 ,就要对非法证据予以排除 ;同时 ,为了保证民事诉讼目的的全面实现 ,就应在刚性规定之外 ,给法官提供一定的自由裁量的空间 ;此外 ,为了避免审理法官受非法证据的不当影响 ,应将非法证据排除在庭审之外 。

The exclusion of illegal evidence in civil litigation reflects the fact that people begin to highpoint the due process in civil litigation. The regulation of exclusion of civil evidence has relation to procedural system and tradition. The author thinks, in order to realize procedural right, we should exclude the illegal evidence, in order to ensure the all-around realization of rights in civil litigation, we should give a room of arbitration to judges. At the same time, exclusion the illegal evidence out of trial may avoid undue-influence to the judges, and devising the standard of proof is necessary.