期刊文献+

中国外贸管理法的范式转换 被引量:1

Transformation of Paradigm in China's Foreign Trade Administration Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在WTO新语境中,为积极参与、有效利用多边贸易体制,分享国际贸易增长与世界经济发展的成果,我国有必要从如下方面实现外贸管理法的范式转换:法律政策方面,实现从自由贸易到自由贸易与公平贸易相结合的转换;法律功能方面,实现从防御型立法到防御与进取型立法相结合的转换;法律价值方面,实现从"以政府为导向"到"以贸易参与人为导向"的转换;纠纷解决方面,实现从"以规则为导向"到"以规则为导向"与"以解决问题为导向"相结合的转换。 In the context of WTO, in order to participate in and make good use of the multilateral trade system and share the benefits from the development of international trade and world economy, it is necessary to transform paradigms in China's foreign trade administration law especially in such aspects as the policy, function and value of law, and the ideology of dispute settlement. As for the policy of law, Free Trade Policy should be transformed into a combination of Free Trade Policy and Fair Trade Policy; as for the function of law, the defense-oriented legislation should be combined with aggression-oriented legislation; as to the value of law, the government-oriented legislation should be transformed into the trader-oriented legislation; and in the aspect of dispute settlement, the rule-oriented paradigm should be transformed into a combination of rule-oriented and dispute-settlement-oriented paradigms.
作者 蔡从燕
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期116-123,共8页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 司法部重点项目(SFB021015)
关键词 中国 外贸管理法 多边贸易体制 法律价值 贸易争端 foreign trade administration, paradigm, transformation, theorization, system testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[2]M. C. E. J. BRONKERS. Selective Safeguard Measures in Multilateral Trade Relations[M]. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1985.
  • 2[3]FABIO SPADI. Discriminatory Safeguards in The Light of The Admission of The People's Republic of China to the World Trade Organization[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002 .
  • 3黄卫平,程大为.发达国家贸易壁垒分析:发展中国家的思索(二)[J].国际贸易问题,2001(4):25-28. 被引量:15
  • 4[8]ROBERT E. HUDEC. Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law[M]. Cameron May, 1999.
  • 5[9][美] E*博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M] .邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
  • 6[15]R. A. POSNER. Economic Analysis of Law[M]. Little Brown & Company, 1986.
  • 7[17]石佑启.论公共行政与行政法学的范式转换[M] .北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
  • 8[18]World Trade Organization, S/FIN/8 4 December 2002 (02-6693); RESTRICTED S/FIN/W/19,Ⅳ: Translations of Measures; RESTRICTED S/FIN/W/18.
  • 9应松年,王锡锌.WTO与中国行政法制度改革的几个关键问题[J].中国法学,2002(1):5-15. 被引量:45

二级参考文献15

  • 1世界银行.2001年全球经济展望[M].,2000..
  • 2世界贸易组织.2000年年度报告[M].,2000..
  • 3.《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第54条[Z].,..
  • 4《关税与贸易总协定》(GATT,1994).Article XXIV,第3条,第10条,第10条,Article X: 1.
  • 5《服务贸易总协定)(GATS).第17条,第6条,第6条,第6条,Article VI.
  • 6《与贸易有关的知识产权保护协定》(TRIPS).第3条,第41条,第41条.
  • 7Stanley B. Lubman, "China's Accession to the WTO: Unfinished Business in Geneva", in Asian Wall Street Journal, 6 May, 2000.
  • 8《中华人民共和国宪法》第3条,第5条.
  • 9Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China , Section 2 (B).
  • 10Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China, Section 2(A).

共引文献58

同被引文献29

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部