人格特质与认知操作关系的新视野被引量：4

A new view on the relationship between personality traits and cognitive performance

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过介绍人格与认知研究的新进展,探讨了人格、能力与认知三者之间的关系,从而为人格特质与认知操作的关系提供了一种新视野。在认知操作或成就水平的预测中,人格至少与能力同等重要;概念与情境的界定、人格与智力的关系、人格特质的测试工具以及变量的控制等问题成为人格与认知关系研究的关键,只有在双向考察的基础上才能完整地理解人格特质与认知操作的关系。 By introducing the recent development in researches on personality and cognition, this paper discusses the relationship between personality, ability and cognition, and provides a new view for the relationship of personality traits and cognitive performance. The author believes that personality is as important as ability when predicting performance and achievement of individuals. Furthermore, problems such as the definition of conceptions and situations, the relationship between personality and intelligence, the test instrument of personality traits and the manipulation of variables are all keys in any researches. What is more, it is possible to understand the relationship only when we look at it from both sides.

作者陈少华曾毅

机构地区广州大学教育学院第一军医大学护理系

出处《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》 2004年第3期83-87,共5页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基金广州大学校内资助项目"认知操作和认知方式与人格特质的关系"课题的阶段性研究成果

关键词人格特质能力大五因素认知操作 personality trait ability big-five-factor cognitive performance

分类号 B844.3 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1[1]Rothstein M G, Paunonen S V, et al. Personality and cognitive ability predictors of performance in graduate business school [ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994, 86:516 ～ 530.
2[2]Judge C E, Bono J E. Five factor model of personality and transformational leadership[ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85: 751～765.
3[3]Eysenck H J, Eysenck M W. Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach [ M]. New York:Plenum Press, 1985.
4[4]Revelle W. Personality and motivation: individual difference[M]. American Psychological Association, 1995.
5[5]Goff M, Ackerman P L. Personality-intelligence relations:assessment of typical intellectual engagement [ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84: 537～ 552.
6[6]Ployhart R E, Lim B C, Chan K Y. Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2001,4:809 ～ 843.
7[7]Rolfhus E L, Ackerman P L. Self-report knowledge: at the crossroads of ability, interest, and personality[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996, 88: 174～ 188.
8[8]Rolfhus E L, Ackerman P L. Assessing individual differences in knowledge: knowledge, intelligence, and related traits[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91:511 ～526.
9许淑莲吴志平吴振云孙长华.成年人个性特征与某些认知作业的关系[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):276-276.
10[10]Hough L M. The big-five personality variables-construct confusion: description versus prediction [ J]. Human Performance, 1992, 5: 139～ 155.

二级参考文献7

1许淑莲吴志平吴振云孙长华.成年人个性特征与某些认知作业的关系[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):276-276.
2Revelle W,Loftus D A.Individual differences and arousal:Implications for the study of mood and memory.Cognition and Emotion,1990,4(2):209～237
3Rolfhus E L,Ackerman P L.Self-report knowledge:At the crossroads of ability,interest,and personality.Journal of Educational Psychology,1996,88(1):174～188
4Rolfhus E L,Ackerman P L.Assessing individual differences in knowledge:Knowledge,intelligence,and related traits.Journal of Educational Psychology,1999,91(3):511～526
5Matthews G A,Harley T A.Effects of extraversion and self-report arousal on semantic priming:A connectionist approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,65(4):735～756
6Brand C,Egan V,Deary I.Intelligence,personality,and society:Constructivist versus essentialist possibilities.In:Detterman D K ed.Current Topics in Human Intelligence.Norwood,NJ:Ablex,1994,1～27
7Stelmack R M,Houlihan M,et al.Personality,reaction time,and event-related potentials.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,65(2):399～40