期刊文献+

Subepithelial basement membrane thickness in patients with normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopy: Results from southern Turkey

Subepithelial basement membrane thickness in patients with normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopy: Results from southern Turkey
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: Our aims were to determine the normal limits of subepithelial basement membrane (SEBM) thickness in order to more accurately diagnose collagenous colitis in the population from southern Turkey and to investigate into links between SEBM thickness and age, and sex. METHODS: The study included 100 patients (mean age 50.0±13.3 years; male, 34; female, 66) with miscellaneous gastrointestinal symptoms, and normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopic evaluation. Biopsies were taken from five different regions of the colon. SEBM was measured with a calibrated eyepiece on specimens prepared with specific stains for collagen. Intensity of inflammatory cells was graded semiquantitatively. Differences in SEBM thickness among the different colon regions, and relationships between SEBM thickness and age, sex, and density of inflammatory cells were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The cecum and rectum showed the largest amounts of infiltrate. None of the specimens showed histologic findings of collagenous colitis. The SEBM thicknesses measured for each case ranged from 3-20 μm. The biggest thickness was observed in rectal mucosa (median value: 10 μm). Cecum and ascending colon showed similar SEBM thickness (median value: 5 μm). SEBM thickness was not correlated with patient age or sex, but was positively correlated with the intensity of inflammatory cells in each colon segment. CONCLUSION: In this patient group from southern Turkey, SEBM was thickest in the rectum. Our results indicate that, in this population, SEBM thickness is not correlated with age or sex, but is positively correlated with severity of inflammation. The findings also support the concept that measuring SEBM thickness at one segment in the colon is inadequate and may be misleading. AIM:Our aims were to determine the normal limits of subepithelial basement membrane (SEBM) thickness in order to more accurately diagnose collagenous colitis in the population from southern Turkey and to investigate into links between SEBM thickness and age,and sex. METHODS:The study included 100 patients (mean age 50.0±13.3 years;male,34;female,66) with miscellaneous gastrointestinal symptoms,and normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopic evaluation.Biopsies were taken from five different regions of the colon.SEBM was measured with a calibrated eyepiece on specimens prepared with specific stains for collagen.Intensity of inflammatory cells was graded semiquantitatively.Differences in SEBM thickness among the different colon regions,and relationships between SEBM thickness and age,sex,and density of inflammatory cells were statistically evaluated. RESULTS:The cecum and rectum showed the largest amounts of infiltrate.None of the specimens showed histologic findings of collagenous colitis.The SEBM thicknesses measured for each case ranged from 3-20 μm.The biggest thickness was observed in rectal mucosa (median value:10μm). Cecum and ascending colon showed similar SEBM thickness (median value:5μm).SEBM thickness was not correlated with patient age or sex,but was positively correlated with the intensity of inflammatory cells in each colon segment. CONCLUSION:In this patient group from southern Turkey, SEBM was thickest in the rectum.Our results indicate that, in this population,SEBM thickness is not correlated with age or sex,but is positively correlated with severity of inflammation.The findings also support the concept that measuring SEBM thickness at one segment in the colon is inadequate and may be misleading.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2004年第7期1056-1058,共3页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 COLONOSCOPY Adult Aged Aged 80 and over Basement Membrane COLON Female Humans Intestinal Mucosa Male Middle Aged RECTUM TURKEY 上皮下基底膜 结肠粘膜 结肠镜检查 土耳其南部 炎症
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Noffsinger AE, Stemmermann GN. Nonneoplastic colon disease. In: Gastrointestinal Pathology. 2^nd ed,Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1999:153-236.
  • 2Bohr J, Olesen M, Tysk C, Jarnerot G. Collagenous and lymphocytic colitis: a clinical and histopathological review. Can J Gastroenterol 2000; 14:943-947.
  • 3Dogusoy G. Mikroskopik kolit. Endoskopi 2001; 12:61-67.
  • 4Carpenter HA, Tremaine WJ, Batts KP, Czaja A. Sequential histologic evaluations in collagenous colitis. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:1903-1909.
  • 5Bohr J. A review of collagenous colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:2-9.
  • 6GledhiU A, Cole FM. Significance of basement membrane thickening in the human colon. Gut 1984; 25:1085-1088.
  • 7Halaby IA, Rantis PC, Vernava AM, Longo WE. Collagenous colitis, pathogenesis and management. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:573-578.
  • 8Tremanine WJ. Diagnosing collagenous colitis: does it make a difference? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11:477-479.
  • 9Tanaka M, Mazzoleni G, Riddell RH. Distribution of collagenous colitis. Utility of flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut 1992; 33:65-70.
  • 10Cammarota G, Pignataro F, Cuoco L. EUS in the diagnosis of collagenous colitis. Gastrointes Endos 2001; 54:113-115.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部