期刊文献+

幼猫鼓阶内慢性电刺激生理学研究 被引量:1

A Physiological Investigation of Chronic Electrical Stimulation with Scala Tympani Electrodes in Kittens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本实验用6只生后2个月的幼猫植入鼓阶电极行慢性电刺激以探讨电听觉的生理学特征。观察到:(1)安全范围内的慢性电刺激对幼猫听力无者害的影响,亦未影响脑干听觉通路对声、电刺激产生的冲动的传递过程;(2)除Ⅰ波被刺激伪迹掩盖外,EABR波形与ABR相似,但前者各波潜伏期随强度改变小,绝对潜伏期比ABR短约1.5ms,波间间期也有意义地缩短;(3)EABR输入——输出曲线电刺激后比电刺激前明显左移。 A physiological investigation of cochlear electrical stimulation was undertaken in six two-month-old kittens.The scala tympani electrodes were implanted and electrically stimulated using biphasic balanced electrical pulses for periods of 1000-1500h in four ears. Four ears received implants for same period but without electrical stimulation. The other two ears served as normal control.The results indicated: 1) Chronic electrical stimulation of the cochlea within electrochemically safe limits did not influence the hearing of kittens and the normal delivery of impulses evoked by acoustic and electrical signals on . the auditory brainstem pathway. 2) The wave shapes of EABRs were similar to those of ABRs. The amplitudes of EABRs showed a significant increase following chronic electrical stimulation, resulting in a leftward shift in the input/ output function. The absolute latencies and interwave latencies of waves Ⅱ-Ⅲ, Ⅲ-Ⅳ and Ⅱ-Ⅳ were significantly shorter than those of ABRs.These results imply that there was no adverse effect of chronic electrical stimulation on the maturing auditory systems of kittens using these electrical parameters and the mechanism of electrical hearing should be further studied.
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1992年第6期402-407,共6页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
基金 NIH资助
关键词 人工耳蜗 电刺激 听性脑干反应 cochlear implant electrical stimulation auditory brainstem response (ABR) electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1

同被引文献8

  • 1刘爱国,王正敏,崔永华,周梁,迟放鲁.刺激电极在鼓阶内位置对听神经兴奋性的影响[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2004,12(4):249-251. 被引量:3
  • 2张道行,张岩昆,田昊,王亮.人工耳蜗植入者EABR、NRT与ESR检测[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2005,13(5):310-313. 被引量:24
  • 3Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity--dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants[J]. Ear Hear, 2003,24 : 485.
  • 4Hardie NA, Sheperd RK. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem[J]. Hearing Research, 1999, 128:147.
  • 5Beitel RE, Snyder RL,Schreiner CE, et al. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds[J]. J Neurophysiol,2000,83:2 145.
  • 6Lindin M, Zurron M, Diaz F. Changes in P300 amplitude during an active standard auditory oddball task[J].Biol Psyehol, 2004,66 :153.
  • 7Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-- Phillips S, et al. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery,1994,120:1 083.
  • 8Sauvaget E, Pereon Y, Nguyen-- The-- Tich S, et al. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: comparison between transtympanie promontory_and round-- window stimulations[J]. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002,32 : 269.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部