期刊文献+

代理父母地位说:美国高校与学生法律关系的主导理论 被引量:20

The "In Loco Parentis" Doctrine: A Dominant Theory of Student-University Relationship in the U. S.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 代理父母地位说曾经一度是美国高校与学生关系的法律基础。据此,高等院校处于代理学生父母的位置上,拥有对学生行为广泛的管教和处罚权力。随着这一学说在20世纪60年代早期的消亡,高校与学生的关系性质发生了巨大变化。代理父母地位说的盛与衰对处于转型中的中国高等教育颇有启迪意义,文中所提及到的学生权利的伸张、高等学校在调整学校与学生关系方面所作出的努力、司法机构在解决高校与学生纠纷过程中的若干判例都会引发我国高教界同行更进一步的思考。 The 'in loco parentis' doctrine was once the legal basis for the student-university relationship at U.S. colleges and universities. Under this doctrine, institutions of higher education stood'in place of the parent' with their students and exercised broad regulatory and disciplinary powers over student conduct. With its demise in early 1960s, the nature of the student-niversity relationship has changed significantly. The ebb and flow of this doctrine also has enlightening implications for the reform and development of colleges and universities in China that are at a time of transition. The items such as the enlargement of students' rights, the efforts made by universities in re-adjusting their relationship with students, and some judicial cases will stimulate more and deeper thinking in China's higher education circles.
作者 李奇 洪成文
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期37-41,共5页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 美国高等学校 代理父母地位 高校与学生的关系 U.S. higher education institutions in loco parentis student-university relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Li, Q., Contract Liability in the Student-university Relationship: Case Law Implications for Universities Policies.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Washington State University, 2002, 15-22.
  • 2Blackstone, W. Commentaries on the Law. 1, 1770,Oxford: Claredon Press.
  • 3Rudolph, F. The American College and University, 1962,New York: Vintage.
  • 4Schuh, J.H. Residence Halls. In A.L. Rentz, and G. L.Saddlemire. Student Affairs in Higher Education, 1988,227 - 260.
  • 5Bickel, R.D., and Lake, P.F. The Rights and Responsibilities of Modern Universities: Who Assumes the Risks of College Life. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press,1999; Dannells, M. From Discipline to Development: Rethinking Student Conduct in Higher Educati
  • 6Pratt v. Wheaton College, 40 Ill. 186 (Ill. 1866).
  • 7Gott v. Berea College, 161 S.W. 204 at 206 (Ky. 1913).
  • 8Upcraft, M. L., and Barr, M. J. Identifying Challenges for the Future in Current Practice. In M.J. Barr, M.L. Upctaft, and Associates. New Future for Student Affairs.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990, 3-21.
  • 9Bradshaw v. Rawlings, 612 F. 2d 135 at 138 (3rd Cir. 1979).
  • 10Veblen, T. The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Businessmen. New York, A. M. Kelley, Bookseller, 1965 [c1918], 165.

同被引文献109

引证文献20

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部