期刊文献+

《出师颂》的时代和价值 被引量:2

The Date and Value of Chu Shi Song
原文传递
导出
摘要 《出师颂》作为无款作品,不存在真伪之辨,主要是定时代、判定前人诸说之是与非的问题。依据后纸米友仁题跋,本幅唐、宋诸鉴藏印和书法的时代风格,将《出师颂》定为隋人书是可信的。其艺术价值,从前人推测为西晋索靖书,或南朝梁萧子云写,或称“隋贤书”,以及历代著录的赞语评价,可证必出自名家之手。作为流传千余年的隋代名家墨迹,两度出入皇宫的内府遗物,故宫博物院有责任将其征购返宫。 Chu Shi Song is a work lacking a seal but there can be no doubts regarding its authenticity; the main questions hinge on its dating and evaluating the veracity of the arguments of earlier scholars. From the later inscription and colophon of Mi Youren and from the dating styles adopted from Song dynasty authenticating collectors, it would seem that Chu Shi Song is a Sui dynasty work. Evaluating the comments by earlier scholars that it is variously the calligraphy of the Western Jin calligrapher Suo Jing, the writing of the Southern Liang scholar 'Xiao' or the work of a 'Sui Master', we know that it must be the work of a renowned calligrapher. In light of the fact that it is a work by a renowned Sui dynasty calligrapher that has survived for more than a millennium and that it has been held in the palace collection on two occasions, it was the responsibility of the Palace Museum to purchase the work and restore it to its original home.
作者 单国强
出处 《故宫博物院院刊》 北大核心 2003年第6期35-42,共8页 Palace Museum Journal
关键词 《出师颂》 版本考证 作者考证 绍兴本 隋朝 书法作品 艺术价值 索靖 萧子云 米友仁 Chu Shi Song Mi Youren Sui Master Suojing 'Xiao' version.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献14

  • 1王重民.莫高窟记(敦煌史料之一)[J].历史研究,1954(2):136-136. 被引量:3
  • 2马德.《莫高窟记》浅议[J].敦煌学辑刊,1987(2):129-131. 被引量:6
  • 3侯仁之.《敦煌县南湖绿洲沙漠化蠡测》[J].中国沙漠,1981,(1).
  • 4吴廷燮.《晋方镇年表》,收于《二十五史补编》,中华书局,1955年,第3385-3451页.
  • 5郝懿行.《尔雅义疏》.《汉小学四种》本,巴蜀书社,2001年版,第1104页.
  • 6张彦远.《法书要录》卷八引张怀瑾《书断中》,北京:人民美术出版社,1986年,第265页.
  • 7陶宗仪等编.《说郛》一百二十卷本(明刻宛委山堂本),《说郛三种》,上海:上海古籍出版社,1988年,第2776页.
  • 8沈曾植.《海日楼题跋》卷二,《海日楼札丛》(外一种),北京:中华书局,1962年,第88页.
  • 9周一良.《敦煌写本书仪考(之二)》,《魏晋南北朝史论集续编》,北京:北京大学出版社,1991年,第225页.
  • 10启功.《<急就篇>传本考》,《启功丛稿·论文卷》,北京:中华书局,1999年,第1-29页.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部