摘要
徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的设置有着重要的意义 ,但目前刑法界对其客体有不同的认识 ,具有几种代表性的观点均不能准确揭示本罪的犯罪客体。要准确界定本罪的客体必须着眼于本罪直接客体的本质和特征的分析 ,并以本罪的不作为犯罪构成为基础 ,具体分析本罪的三大特点 ,进而准确界定本罪的犯罪客体 。
The installation of the charge of irregularities for favoritism non-transferring criminal cases is of great significance. But at present there are differences in determining the object of the crime in circles of criminal law. None of the representative views exactly reveal the object of the crime. Author of this article considers that in order to exactly determine the object of the crime we must analyse the nature and characteristics of the direct object of the crime . On the basis of the constitution of the negative crime, the author concretely analyses three features of the crime, and then exactly defines the object of the crime which is the obligation that the law enforcement officials of administration transfers criminal cases to the judicial authority and the criminal judicial functions and powers.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
2004年第5期73-75,共3页
Hebei Law Science