期刊文献+

应用实体动态模型对三维磁性传感取样法的研究

A study of three-dimensional magnetic sensor acquisition: using a dynamic in vitro model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价三维磁性传感系统测量左心室每搏容积的准确性。材料与方法:将模拟左心室的乳胶气球模型悬浮在水槽中,与能产生10个不同每搏输出量的泵相连(20~65mlbeat)。用三维Echopac软件根据Simpson’法测量气球的容s积,分别与传统的二维面积长度法(0.5AL)所测容积及直接测量气球容积所得的参考值比较。结果:三维法测值(=0.91x+Y0.41r=0.97SEE=2.83ml,P<0.001,,)比二维法测值(Y=0.49x+8.68r=0.87SEE=3.87ml,P<0.001,,)具有更好的相关性;三维与二维法之间差异具有非常显著性意义,P<0.001。结论:三维磁性传感取样法实用准确,有利于对左心室功能的评价。 Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of this three-dimensional(3D) magnetic position sensor system in the quantification of ventricular stroke volumes in a dynamic model. Methods: A latex balloon model of the left ventricle was suspended in a water bath connected to a pump producing 10 different pulsatile stroke volumes(20~65ml/beat). Scanning was performed using a 5.0MHz transducer mounted with a magnetic receiver(GE System Five). The probe was scanned to sweep continuously across and over the balloon volume over 3~7s. Digital loops were stored on magneto-optical disk and reviewed retrospectively using 3D Echopac software(GE) based on Simpson's method and compared with a two-dimensional(2D) biplane area-length method(0.5AL) measurements at end systole and end diastole. Both 3D and 2D derived stroke volumes were compared with the reference stroke volume calculated by direct measurement of balloon capacity. Results: There was an improved correlation between 3D stroke volume and reference stroke volume(Y=0.91x+0.41, r=0.97, SEE=2.83ml, P<0.001) compared to 2D stroke volume and reference stroke volume(Y=0.49x+8.68, r=0.87, SEE=3.87ml, P<0.001), there is significant difference between 2D and 3D(P<0.001). Conclusion: 3D magnetic scanning is practical, accurate and should facilitate assessment of left ventricular function.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2004年第2期75-77,共3页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 心脏功能试验 超声心动描记术 heart function tests echocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Bucky JC, Beattie JM, Nixon JV, et al. Right and left ventricular volumes in vitro by a new non-geometric method[J]. Am J Card Imaging, 1987, 1: 227-233.
  • 2[2]Siu SC, Rivera JM, Handschumacher MD, et al. Threedimensional echocardiography: the influence of number of component images on accuracy of left ventricular volume quantitation [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1996, 9: 147-155.
  • 3[3]Schiller N, Shah P, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on standards Subcommittee[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1989, 2: 358-367.
  • 4[4]Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J]. Lancet,1986, 1: 307-310.
  • 5[5]Kaual S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function nsing two-dimensional echocardiography [J]. Am Heart J, 1984, 107: 526-531.
  • 6[6]Jiang L, Handschumacher MD, Cordy BS, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of right ventricular volume: in vitro comparison with two-dimensional methods [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1994, 7: 150-158.
  • 7[7]Gopal AS, Keller AM, Rigling R, et al. Left ventricular volume and endocardial surface area by three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993, 22: 258-270.
  • 8[8]Sapin PM, Schrder KM, Gopal AS, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with cineventriculography for measurement of left ventticular volume in patients [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994, 24: 1054-1063.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部