期刊文献+

社会支持与抑郁症的相关性分析 被引量:25

Correlation analysis of social support and depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨社会支持与抑郁症的关系,为抑郁症的预防和康复干预的介入提供依据。方法:用社会支持量表评定抑郁症组78例患者和正常对照组86例的社会支持度,采用汉密顿抑郁量表(Hamiltonratingscalefordepression,HAMD)评定抑郁症患者的病情严重程度和疗效。结果:抑郁症组患者的客观支持犤(11.9±3.5)分犦与正常对照组犤(11.9±3.3)分犦差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),主观支持犤(15.0±3.9)分犦和对支持的利用度犤(6.4±2.0)分犦显著低于正常对照组犤(22.6±4.0)分和(8.5±1.9)分,P<0.01犦,社会支持与抑郁症的严重程度无关(r=0.144,-0.107,-0.119,P>0.05),主观支持和对支持的利用度与HAMD减分率呈正相关(r=0.495,0.419,P<0.01)。结论:抑郁症患者社会支持系统存在异常,加强抑郁症患者对社会支持的主观感受性和利用度有利于抑郁症状的好转。 AIM:To explore the relationship between social support and depression,and provide evidence for the prevention of depression and intervention of rehabilitation. METHODS:The degree of social support of depression group(n=78)and normal control group(n=86)was assessed by social support scale,the degree of severity and effect of disease were assessed by Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD). RESULTS:There was no difference in the objective support between the depression group (11.9±3.5)and the control group(11.9±3.3)(P >0.05).The subjective support (15.0±3.9 )and utilization of social support (6.4±2.0) of the depression group were significantly lower than that of the control group[(22.6±4.0) and(8.5±1.9), respectively,P< 0.01].The social support was not related to the degree of severity(r=0.144,-0.107,-0.119,P >0.05), while the subjective support and utilization of support were positively related to the decreased rate of HAMD(r=0.495,0.419,P< 0.01).
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2003年第30期4108-4109,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
关键词 社会支持 抑郁症 相关性 预防 康复 There is abnormality in social support system of depression patient. It is good for improvement of depression to enhance the subjective impressibility and utilization of social support in depression patients.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1张通,孟家眉,项曼君.脑卒中后抑郁症的前瞻性研究[J].中华精神科杂志,1996,29(2):73-76. 被引量:174
  • 2王向东.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订刊)[M].中国心理卫生杂志,1999.127-131,131-133,220-224,253-256.
  • 3[1]King NJ, Bernstein GA. School refusal in children and adolescents: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2001,40(2) : 197~205
  • 4[2]Burke AE, Silverman WK. The prescriptive treatment of school refusal. Clin Psychol Rev, 1987, 7 : 353~362
  • 5杨德林主编.精神卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,.
  • 6[4]Vaillant GE. Natural history of male psychological health: the relation of choice of ego mechanisms of defense to adult ajustment. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1976, 33(5) : 535~545
  • 7[5]Bond M, Gardner ST, Christian J, et al. Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1983, 40(3) : 333~338
  • 8[6]Vaillant GE. Empirical evidence that defensive styles are independent of environmental influence. Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. Washington. DC: America Psychiatric Press, 1992
  • 9[7]Vaillant GE. Theoretical hierarchy of adoptive ego mechanism: a 30year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1971,24(1) : 107~118
  • 10于晓荣,霍晓东,路顺义,曾嵘.脑卒中后情感障碍发病因素探讨[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1997,23(4):237-238. 被引量:35

共引文献143

同被引文献175

引证文献25

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部