期刊文献+

放疗参考点在平板床和非平板床CT片中变化的研究

Study on Difference of Radiotherapy Referred Point Between Round Couch and Flat Couch CT Scan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较体内某参考点在平板床和非平板床CT片上的变化情况。方法 :选择 36例同时摄平板及非平板床CT片的成人胸部肿瘤患者 ,测量两种条件下CT片上前后径、体内参考点到前、后表面正中的距离。结果 :两种条件下 (平板床与非平板床 )CT片上前后径、前径及后径差值均数分别为 :(0 82± 0 5 8)cm ,95 %CI[0 84 36 ,0 2 80 8];(0 5 6± 0 4 3)cm ,95 %CI[0 5 487,0 12 4 4];(0 5 0± 0 4 1)cm ,95 %CI[0 4 2 30 ,0 0 0 2 0 ]。 3组数据经自身配对t检验差异均有显著意义 ,t值分别为 4 0 5 6、3 196、2 2 35 ,P值分别为 0 0 0 0 3、0 0 0 31、0 0 316。结论 :用CT片制定放射治疗计划时应充分考虑平板床与非平板床的差异。 Objective To study the difference of referred point between round couch and flat couch CT scan.Methods Thirty six adult patients with chest tumor who had diagnostic and radiotherapy treatment planning CT scan at the same time were selected,and the body thickness,anterior and posterior depths of them were measured in two conditions,round couch and flat couch.Results The average differences between two CT scans were (0 82±0 58)cm,95%CI[0 843 6,0 280 8];(0 56±0 43)cm,95%CI[0 548 7,0 124 4];(0 50±0 41)cm,95%CI[0 423 0,0 002 0],respectively.All the differences were significant statistically by Paired Samples T test ( t =4 056, P =0 000 3; t =3 196, P =0 003 1; t =2 235, P =0 031 6).Conclusions The difference between round couch and flat couch should be concerned fully when a CT scan is being obtained for radiotherapy treatment planning.
出处 《肿瘤防治杂志》 2003年第6期631-633,共3页 China Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 肿瘤 放射疗法 算法 体层摄影术 X线计算机 方法 neoplasms/radiotherapy arithmetic tomoguaphy,X ray computed/methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Disler DG,Marr DS, Rosenthal DI. Accuracy of volume measurements of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging phantoms by three-dimentional reconstruction and preliminary clinical application [J]. Invest Radiol, 1994,29 (8): 739 - 745.
  • 2Zeman RK,Baron RL,Jeffery RB,et al. Helical body CT:evolution of scanning protocals[J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 1998,170(6): 1427-1438.
  • 3Geffand DW,Schwarz DL,Ott DJ.The illustrated report[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996,167(5): 1099 - 1100.
  • 4Gurland J, Johnson RO. Case for using only maximum diameter in measuring tumors [J ]. Cancer Chemother Rep, 1996,50:119- 124.
  • 5Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, et al. Computed tomography of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: comparison of tumor size measured by dynamic computed tomography and histopathologic examination [J].Pancreas, 1996,13(3) :231 - 235.
  • 6Valicenti RK, Wasserman TH, Kucik NA. Analysis of prognostic factors in localized gastric lymphoma: the importance of bulk of disease[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993,27 (3): 591 - 598.
  • 7Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP. Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic(nude) mice[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1989,24(3): 148 - 154.
  • 8Hopper KD, Kasales C J, Eggli KD,et al.The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of a assessing response to treatment [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1996,20(6) :930 - 937.
  • 9Eggli KD, Close P, Dillon PW, et al. Three-dimensional quantitation of pediatric tumor bulk [J]. Pediatr Radiol, 1995,25 ( 1 ): 1 - 6.
  • 10Mohan R, Barest G, Brester LJ, et al. A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1988,15(2) :481 - 495.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部