摘要
在虚概念问题上,有两种对立的观点:一种认为虚概念有内涵而没有外延;一种认为虚概念有内涵也有外延。两种观点的对立,源于对虚概念外延的理解持不同的本体论立场。前者对虚概念的外延持一种激进实在论的观点,认为外延应该是一种物质实体的存在;而后者对虚概念的外延持一种非实在论的观点,主张虚概念的外延可以是一种非物质实体的存在。
We have two different views on the problem of the False Concept.Some think there are no extension but intennsion,while some others think there are both extension and intension in the False Concept.On the basis of modern philosophy of logic ,this paper deals with the problem of the false concept.In my opinion,the reason why these people have different ideas about it that they have different understanding of the into logy on the False Concept.The former issue is based on the radical-realism on the extension of the False Concept.They think the extension should be the individual of substance.However,the latter issue is based on the un-realism on the extension of the False Concept.They think the extension may be un-substance.
出处
《内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版)》
2003年第5期16-17,共2页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Social Sciences
关键词
虚概念
外延
实在论
非实在论
本体论
The false concept
Extension
Realism
Un-realism
Ontology