期刊文献+

丹参和异搏定对高能冲击波致兔肾损伤的保护作用 被引量:4

Protective effects of salvia miltiorrhiza and verapamil on high energy shock wave induced renal damage in rabbits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨丹参对高能冲击波致家兔肾损伤的保护作用及机制 .方法 :将家兔 4 5只随机分为 3组 ,丹参组、异搏定组和生理盐水对照组各 1 5只 ,ESWL前 3d分别iv丹参注射液、异搏定和生理盐水 ,测定体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL)前后不同时间血浆中内皮素 (ET 1 )和超氧化物歧化酶 (SOD)及血清中丙二醛 (MDA)变化 .结果 :对照组ESWL后血浆中ET 1和血清中MDA值较ESWL前显著升高 (PET 1 =0 .0 1 5 ,PMDA=0 .0 1 ) ,而血浆中SOD活性显著性降低 (P =0 .0 0 3) .丹参组和异搏定组ESWL后血浆中ET 1和血清MDA较ESWL前无显著性变化 ,且高峰值均显著低于对照组 ;而血浆SOD活性虽较ESWL前降低 ,但却显著高于对照组 (丹参 :P =0 .0 0 1 ;异搏定 :P =0 .0 2 2 ) .丹参组和异搏定组两组间 3个指标均无显著性差异 .结论 :丹参与异搏定一样对高能冲击波致家兔肾损伤具有保护作用 . AIM: To study the protective effects of salvia miltiorrhiza on high energy shock wave induced renal damage in rabbits. METHODS: A total of 45 rabbits was randomly assigned to 3 groups. Control received physiological saline and the others received salvia miltiorrhiza and verapamil for 3 days before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripy (ESWL), respectively. Plasma ET 1, SOD and serum MDA were measured. RESULTS: After ESWL, there was a significant increase in plasma ET 1 ( P =0.015) and serum MDA levels ( P =0.01) and the activity of SOD in plasma decreased significantly ( P =0.003) compared with that before ESWL in control. In salvia miltiorrhiza and verapamil groups, however, plasma ET 1 and serum MDA after ESWL were not significantly different compared with the values before ESWL and were significantly lower than those of the controlled groups. Although the levels of the plasma SOD after ESWL decreased compared with the pre ESWL levels, the activity of SOD in plasma was significantly higher than that of the controlled ones (salvia miltiorrhiza: P =0.001, verapamil: P =0.022). All parameters were not significantly different between salvia miltiorrhiza and verapamil groups. CONCLUSION: Salvia miltiorrhiza and verapamil both have protective effects on shockwave induced renal injury in rabbits.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2004年第4期363-364,共2页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
基金 陕西省科技攻关项目 (2 0 0 1K1 1 G7)
关键词 碎石术 肾/损伤 丹参 维拉帕米 lithotripsy kidney/injury salvia miltiorrhiza verapamil
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[3]Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Kuo RL, et al. In vivo assessment of free radical activity during shock wave lithotripsy using a microdialysis system: The renoprotective action of allopurinol [J]. J Urol, 2002;167(1):327-334.
  • 2[4]Sivagnana M, Masui N, Paymond LH. Free radical scavengers, catalase and superoxide dismutase provide protection from oxalate-associated injury to LLC-pk1 and Mdck cells [J]. J Urol, 2000;164(1):224-229.

同被引文献47

  • 1江军,方玉华,靳风烁,唐维佳,刘力宇,李黔生,邓晓洪.高能冲击波与肾脏损伤量效关系的实验研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1994,15(3):169-170. 被引量:39
  • 2孙雅军,洪佳平,吴卫真,王庆华.体外冲击波碎石术对肾脏组织损伤的探讨[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1995,10(6):341-342. 被引量:7
  • 3罗晓辉,陈兴发,薛玉泉,王新阳,贺大林,汤正岐.不同冲击波源及次数致家兔肾损伤的比较研究[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2007,12(4):219-221. 被引量:4
  • 4孙西钊.医学冲击波[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2006.
  • 5中华医学会泌尿外科学分会.中国尿石症诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
  • 6Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis [ M ]. In: EAU guidelines,2008.
  • 7Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi [J]. J Urol,1997,158(2) :1915-1921.
  • 8Pearle MS, Nadler R, Bercowsky E, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi[J]. J Urol,2001,166(4) : 1255-1260.
  • 9Strohmaier WL,Schubert G,Rosenkranz T,et al. Comparison of extracor- poreal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi : a prospective study [ J ]. Eur Urol, 1999,36 ( 5 ) : 376-379.
  • 10Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: Holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [ J ]. J Urol, 2002,167 ( 5 ) : 1972-1976.

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部