期刊文献+

血管内支架置入治疗高危颈动脉狭窄 被引量:20

Endovascular stenting for high risk patients with high grade internal carotid stenosis combined with occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价伴对侧颈内动脉闭塞的高危颈内动脉狭窄病人血管内支架治疗的疗效和安全性。方法  8例不适合颈动脉内膜剥脱的高危颈内动脉狭窄病人接受了血管内支架置入治疗。术前颈内动脉平均狭窄程度为 (85 2± 9 4) % (70 %~ 98% )。术前和术后 2 4h采用NIHSS评分 ,术前和术后 3个月采用改良Rakin评分标准对这些病人进行神经功能评分。术后随访 6~ 1 4个月。结果 术中造影证实 8枚支架均放置成功 ,残余狭窄程度 (5 3± 2 2 ) % (5 %~ 9% ) ,管腔狭窄程度较术前明显改善 (t=4 79,P <0 0 0 1 )。术中没有发生与手术相关的并发症 ,术后 2 4h病人的NIHSS神经功能评分保持在术前水平 [(2 5± 2 4)分 ] ;术后 3个月 ,改良Rakin神经功能评分为 (1 1 3± 0 99)分 ,同术前 (1 2 5± 1 2 8)分比较差异无显著性意义 (T =1 89,P >0 0 5)。术后随访 6~ 1 4个月 ,除 1例偶发一过性脑缺血发作 (TIA)外 ,其他病人未再出现TIA和新的中风。结论 血管内支架置入术是治疗高危颈内动脉狭窄安全。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for high risk patients with high grade internal carotid artery stenosis combined with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery. Methods From October,2000 to December,2001, 8 patients with high grade stenosis of one internal carotid artery combined with occlusion of the other whose conditions were not suitable for carotid endarterectomy, were treated through endovascular approach. The stenotic degree of the lesions before procedures was (85.2±9.4)%(70%-98%). NIHSS was used to evaluate the neurological function before and after endovascular stenting, and modified Rakin scale was used before and 3 months after endovascular stenting. Carotid arterial ultrasound and transcranial Doppler (TCD) examinations were used before and 2 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after procedure. The averaged follow up duration was 9 months (6-14 months). Results Predilation was made in 3 patients in whom the stenotic degree of the lesions was more than 90%. Five Smart self expanding stents and 3 Wallstent were applied in the 8 patients. All the procedures were technologically successful, and the residual stenosis after procedures were (5.3± 2.2)% (5%-9%). The carotid stenosis after procedure was improved significantly compared with that of preoperation( t =4.79, P <0.001). There were no clinical complications associated with the procedures. The NIHSS score of all the patients remained unchanged 24 hours after the procedures. The average modified Rakin score 3 months after stenting was (1.13±0.99), showing no significant difference compared with that of preprocedure(1.25±1.28)( T =1.89, P >0.05). Results of carotid ultrasound and TCD examinations showed that the stenotic arteries in which stents were placed were patent, the velocity of blood flow after procedures was markedly improved, and the blood perfusion improved not only at the procedure side but also at the carotid occlusive side in some patients. Neither new stroke nor TIA happened during the follow up period. Conclusion Endovascular stenting is an effective and safe method for the treatment of high risk internal carotid stenosis combined with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery which is not suitable for carotid endarterectomy.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第6期542-546,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 血管内支架置入 治疗 颈动脉狭窄 神经功能评分 Radiology, interventional Carotid Stenosis Stents Carotid artery, internal
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) steering committee: North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Methods, patient characteristics and progress. Stroke, 1991, 22: 711-720.
  • 2Mericle RA, Kim SH, Lanzino G,et al. Carotid artery angioplasty and use of stents in high-risk patients with contralateral occlusions. J Neurosurg, 1999,90: 1031-1036.
  • 3Beebe HG, Kritpracha B. Carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy update on the controversy. Vasc Surg, 1998,11:46-51.
  • 4Joint officers of the congress of neurological surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeon. Carotid angioplasty and stent: an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery, 1997,40:344-345.
  • 5Queshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, et al. Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke,1999,30:2086-2093.
  • 6Fessler RD, Lanzino G, Guterman LR, et al. Improved cerebral perfusion after stenting of a perous carotid stenosis: technical case report. Neurosurgery, 1999, 45:638-642.
  • 7Dangas G, Laird LF Jr, Satler LF, et al. Postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stent placement: predictors and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Radiology, 2000, 215:677-683.
  • 8Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, et al. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part Ⅱ--Clinical aspects and recommendations(Review). Neurosurgery, 2000,46:1360-1376.
  • 9Robbin ML,Lockhart ME, Weber TM, et al. Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology, 1997,205:749-756.
  • 10Mendelsohn FO, Weissman NJ, Lederman RJ, et al. Acute hemodynamic changes during carotid artery stenting. Am J Cardiol, 1998,82:1077-1081.

二级参考文献8

共引文献89

同被引文献236

引证文献20

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部