期刊文献+

支抗种植体外形对骨界面应力分布的影响 被引量:11

The effects of implant shapes on stress distribution in implant-bone interface
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨三种圆柱状支抗种植体外形差异对骨界面应力分布的影响 ,以筛选最佳支抗种植体。方法 :用三维有限元方法给种植体施加150g近远中方向的载荷 ,分别对刃状螺纹型、矩形螺纹型及光滑型支抗种植体 -骨界面进行应力和位移分析。结果 :三种种植体颈部的Von-Mises应力值分别为0.5330MPa、1.1600MPa、0.8900MPa;位移分别为0.1630μm、0.1690μm、0.1460μm。结论 :刃状螺纹种植体做支抗时 ,其颈部应力值最低 ,而三种种植体颈部的齿槽骨位移差异不显著 。 Objective:To investigate the effects of different shapes of implant on stress distribution in implant-bone interface,thus screening the most appropriate shape for orthodontic anchorage.Method:To analysis the stress and strain in implant-bone interface for knife-shaped threaded,square threaded and smooth type implants which was150grams loaded mesiodistally,employing3-dimesion finite element analysis method.Results:The Von-mises stress atcervixofthese implantshapes were0.5330MPa、1.1600MPa、0.8900MPa.The alveoˉlar bone deformation at the cervix of implants were0.1630μm、0.1690μm、0.1460μm respectively.Concluˉsion:The stress in implant-bone interface for knife-shaped threaded implant was the smallest among these three types of implants.However,the difference for alveolar bone deformation at the cervix of these3type implants were minimal.Thus knife-shaped threaded implant was more suitable for orthodontic anchorage.
出处 《中国口腔种植学杂志》 2003年第2期61-63,92,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助项目(A2002944)
关键词 支抗种植体 外形 骨界面 应力分布 三雏有限元 implant anchorage three-dimesion finite element analysis anchorage implant-bone interˉface stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[2]Nishihara K,Nakagiri S.Biomechanical studies on newly tailored artificial dental root.Bioed Mater Eng,1994,(3): 141~149
  • 2岑远坤,毛祥彦,何佳凝,鲜苏琴.全下颌牙种植义齿及支持组织应力的三维有限元分析Ⅴ.种植体类型对覆盖种植义齿应力分布的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1997,15(1):64-66. 被引量:5
  • 3[4]Holmgren EP,Seckinger RJ,Kilgren LM et al.Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter,implant shape,and load direction.J-Oral-Implantol,1998,24(2):80~88
  • 4[5]Adams WK.Employing finite element modeling in the design optimization of prosthodontic implants (Master of Science Thesis).1985
  • 5[6]Mailath G,Stoiber B,Atzek G et al.Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants-a biomechani cal phenomenon: Finite element study.Z Stomatol,1989,86(4):207~216
  • 6[7]Tsutsumi S,Fukuda S,Tani Y.Biomechanical designing of implant.J Dent Res,1989,68(Special Issue):766
  • 7[9]Siegele D,Soltesz U.Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone.Int J of Oral Maxillofacial Implants.1989,4(4): 333~340
  • 8[10]French AA,Bowles CQ,Parcham PL et al.Comparison of peri-implant stress transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants.Int J Periodont Res Dent,1989,9(3):221~230
  • 9[11]Akpinar I,Parnas I,Sahin S et al.A comparsion of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implants design for distal-extension fixed prostheses.Quintessence Int,1996,27(1): 11~16
  • 10[12]Hurson S.Thread implant design critera.Int J Dent Symp,1994,2(1):38~41

二级参考文献5

共引文献28

同被引文献171

引证文献11

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部