期刊文献+

不同场强下部分DSA介入性器械伪影的探讨 被引量:2

Study of the artifacts of some DSA interventional instruments on different field intensity MR images
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨 0 .3T、1.5T场强下各种DSA介入性器械伪影的大小及其影响因素 ,评价各种介入性器械行MR检查的安全性以及进行MR介入操作的可行性。方法 :将胆管内支架、聚酯动脉化疗药盒、镍钛合金静脉化疗药盒、球囊、微导管等介入性器械置于模具中 ,在 0 .3T、1.5T场强下均行MR扫描 8次 ,观察比较各种介入性器械在两种不同场强下伪影的大小及其影响因素。结果 :胆管内支架在 0 .3T场强下显示比 1.5T更为清晰 ,两种场强下不同序列不同参数对其伪影无明显影响。聚酯动脉化疗药盒在两种场强下不同序列均无伪影。镍钛合金静脉化疗药盒在 0 .3T场强下伪影较小 ,在1.5T场强下伪影较大 ,但两者差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。各种导管在不同场强下无伪影。各种导丝在两种场强下伪影较明显。结论 :行胆管内支架、聚酯动脉化疗药盒、镍钛合金静脉化疗药盒等治疗后行低场强 (0 .3T)MR检查伪影极小 ,是安全可行的。聚酯动脉化疗药盒在 1.5T场强下无伪影 ,胆管内支架、镍钛合金静脉化疗药盒在 1.5T场强下伪影较小 ,但仍适合MR检查。各种导管在不同场强下均无伪影 ,在不同场强下行MR介入操作是安全可行的。 Objective:To investigate the factors that affect the artifacts of the DSA interventional instruments on the images of 0.3T, 1.5T MR scan, and to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of the instruments during MR scanning in 0.3T, 1.5T.Methods:Tests were performed by placing cholangio-stent, polyester drug treatment pump, nickel-titanium alloy pump, Foley's tube and microtube into a block, all experimental tests were performed under 0.3T, 1.5T MR scanner. Then the sizes of the artifacts and the factors that affect the artifacts were observed.Results:Cholangio-stent is clearer on 0.3T MR images than that on 1.5T MR images, different sequences and parameters have no effects on the artifacts. Polyester drug treatment pump has no artifact on the MR images. Nickel-titanium alloy pump has small artifact on the 0.3T MR images, but has larger artifact on the 1.5T MR images. All the tubes have no artifacts, but the films have markedly artifacts.Conclusion:The patient with cholangio-stent, polyester drug treatment pump or nickel-titanium alloy pump is safe to perform 0.3T MR examination, because the instruments have small artifact. Polyester drug treatment pump has no artifact on 1.5T MR images, cholangio-stent, or nickel-titanium alloy pump has mild artifact on 1.5T MR images. All the tubes have no artifact on 0.3T and 1.5T MR images.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2004年第3期229-232,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 华中科技大学学科交叉基金项目资助
关键词 磁共振成像 放射学 介入性 介入性器械 对比研究 Magnetic resonance imaging Radiology, interventional Interventional instrument Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1刘于宝,胡道予,夏黎明,王承缘.介入性磁共振器械的研究[J].放射学实践,2003,18(8):611-613. 被引量:8
  • 2武乐斌,李成利,林征宇,陈立光,邱秀玲,李康安.介入性磁共振技术临床应用经验初探[J].医学影像学杂志,2002,12(2):96-98. 被引量:12
  • 3Frahm C,Gehl HB,Melchert UH,et al.Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,1996,19:335-340.
  • 4Ladd ME,Erhart P,Debatin JF,et al.Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts[J].Magn Reson Med,1996,36:646-651.
  • 5Wildermuth S,Debatin JF,Leung DA,et al.MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures:initial demonstration in a pig model[J].Radiology,1997,202:578-583.
  • 6Wildermuth S,Dumoulin CL,Pammatter T,et al.MR-guided percutaneous angioplasty:assessment of tracking safety,catheter handling and functionality[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,1998,21:404-410.

二级参考文献8

  • 1LüdekeKM Rschmann P Tischler R.Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging[J].Magn Reson Imaging,1985,3(2):329-343.
  • 2贺能树 张云亭 等.介入性磁共振成像[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.281.
  • 3Debain, J F Adam G, Baetr, A L, et al. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging[M]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998.
  • 4Parkkola R. Cases in clinical confidence: MR-guided musculoskeletal biopsies[J]. Marconi Medical Systems, Inc,2000.
  • 5Risto Ojala, Frkki, Vahala, et al. Nerve root infiltration of the first sacral root with MRI guidance[J].JMRI,2000,12:556.
  • 6Per Kristian Hol. MRI-guided celiac plexus block[J] .JMRI,2000,12:562.
  • 7卢延,张雪哲.磁共振成像技术的临床应用前景[J].中华放射学杂志,1998,32(11):726-727. 被引量:11
  • 8赵剑波,陈勇.介入性磁共振成像的现状及展望[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2000,23(1):13-15. 被引量:6

共引文献17

同被引文献26

  • 1靳二虎,马大庆.MR检查时人体内生物医学置入物和置入设备的安全性研究进展及对策[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(9):999-1001. 被引量:11
  • 2戴永雨,张晶,高培毅,何志华.牙科金属对头部磁共振成像的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,1996,30(6):409-409. 被引量:4
  • 3高元贵,蔡幼拴,蔡祖龙.磁共振成像诊断学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,1999:122-128.
  • 4Laakman RW, Kaufman B, Han JS, et al. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants [ J ]. Radiology, 1985,15 ( 7 ) : 11 - 14.
  • 5Lissac M, Metrop D, Brugirard J, et al. Dnetal materials and magnetic resonance imaging[ J]. Invest Radiol,1991,26(1 ) :40 -45.
  • 6霍沃德里.颅脑MR和CT诊断学[M].西安:世界图书出版西安公司,2001:75-99.
  • 7Vikhoff B, Ribbelin S, Kohler B, et al. Artefacts caused by dental filling materials in MR imaging [ J]. Acta Radiologica, 1995, 36 (3) :23 -25.
  • 8Tominaga T, Shimizu H,Koshu K,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of titanium anterior cervical spine palting systems[J]. Neurosurgery, 1995,36(9) :51 -55.
  • 9Hideki M, Takashi I, Kuniaki Q, et al. Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials : comparison of 0.5,1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields[ J ]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) , 2005, 45 (8) :395 - 399.
  • 10Burtscher IM, Owman T, Romner B, et al. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameter[ J ]. Acta Radiologica, 1998, 39 ( 1 ) : 70 - 76.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部