1C. Burger,G. Goerres,S. Schoenes,A. Buck,A. Lonn,G. von Schulthess. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients[J] 2002,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging(7):922~927
2Jonathan M. Links. Advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation: considerations in the design and selection of an imaging system[J] 1998,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(10):1453~1466
3Dale L. Bailey. Transmission scanning in emission tomography[J] 1998,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(7):774~787
4Frank M. Bengel,Sibylle I. Ziegler,Norbert Avril,Wolfgang Weber,Christian Laubenbacher,Markus Schwaiger. Whole-body positron emission tomography in clinical oncology: Comparison between attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images[J] 1997,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(9):1091~1098
5Hermann Ostertag,Wolfgang K. Kübler,Josef Doll,Walter J. Lorenz. Measured attenuation correction methods[J] 1989,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(11):722~726
8Budinger TF. PET instrumentation: what are the limits. Semin Nucl Med, 1998,28(3) :247-267.
9Zhang H, Inoue T, Tian M, et al. A basic study on lesion detectability for hot spot imaging of positron emitters with dedicated PET and positron coincidence gamma camera. Ann Nucl Med, 2001,15(3) : 301-306.
10Visvikis D, Costa DC, Croasdale I, et al. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of ^18F-FDG uptake in PET. Eur J Nucl Med, 2003, 30: 344-353.