期刊文献+

中国入世对国际经济影响的量化分析 被引量:3

A Quantitetive Analysis on the Effect of China's WTO Accession to World Economy
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国工业品出口引起的竞争加剧会不会导致东南亚国家非工业化 ,使它们回到作为初级产品出口国的地位 ?或者 ,制造业产业链中是否存在东南亚国家可以专业化的有利空间 ?通过G Cubed亚太模型的模拟表明 ,中国大量劳动力全面进入国际劳动分工只有在满足以下两个条件的情况下才会导致东南亚国家的非工业化 :流向东南亚国家的国外直接投资大量地转向中国 ,并且东南亚国家放任FDI流入的下降从而降低由此带来的技术扩散。如果东南亚国家能够通过其它方式很快吸收国外新技术及提高本土技术创新能力阻止技术下降 ,那么它们就能在国际制造业产业链中找到有利空间。本文的政策含义是 :东南亚国家要通过向它们的科学家和管理者加速扩散新知识以及为那些下岗工人提供合适的再培训 ,从而将人力资本的深化与广化作为首要考虑的目标。 Would the growing competition from Chinese industrial exports de-industrialize Southeast Asia (SEA), returning SEA to being a primary commodity exporter? Or would there be sufficient lucrative niches within the manufacturing production chains that SEA could specialize in? Our simulations of the G-Cubed Asia Pacific model suggest that the full integration of China's huge labor force into the international division of labor would de-industrialize SEA only if two conditions are met: foreign direct investment is significantly redirected away from SEA toward China, and SEA allows the drop in FDI inflow to lower the rate of technological diffusion to its economies. If SEA could prevent itself from falling behind technologically by finding new ways to absorb new foreign technologies quickly and by increasing the indigenous capacity for technical innovations, then it could find lucrative niches within the international manufacturing production chains. The policy implication is that SEA must give the highest priority to deepening and widening it pool of human capital by speeding up the diffusion of new knowledge to its scientists and managers, and providing appropriate retraining programs for the displaced workers.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期16-25,共10页 Economic Research Journal
基金 哥伦比亚大学全球化和持续发展中心主办的东亚项目中中国经济发展课题的一部分
关键词 中国 入世 国际经济 量化分析 经济增长率 FDI 对外直接投资 TFP 全要素生产率 AP-GCUBED模型 国际分工 经济全球化 China's WTO accession G-Cubed Asia Pacific model De-industrialization of Southeast Asia
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Abe, Shigeyuki,2003, " Is 'China Fear' Warranted? Perspectives from Japan's Trade and Investment Relationships with China", Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 2 No. 2, Spring/Summer, pp. 106-131.
  • 2Chen, Tain-Jy,2003, "Will Taiwan be Marginalised by China?" Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 2No. 2, Spfing/Sunaner, pp. 78-97.
  • 3McKibbin, Warwick and Wing Thye Woo ,2003, "The Consequences of China' s WTO Accession on its Neighbours," Asian Economic Papers,Vol. 2 No. 2, Spring/Summer, pp. 1-38.
  • 4Okabe, Misa, 2002, "International R&D Spillovers and Trade Expansion", Asean Economic Bulletin, Vol. 19 No. 2, August.
  • 5Qin, Julia Ya, 2003, "WTO-Plus Obligations and Their Implications for the World Trade Organization Lecal System: An Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol," Journal of World Trade, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 483-522.
  • 6Sachs, Jeffrey D. , and Wing Thye Woo, 2003, "China' s Growth after WTO Membership", Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies, January, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-33.
  • 7United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2002, World Investment Report 2002: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness.
  • 8Woo, Wing Thye, 2001, "Recent Claims of China's Economic Exceptionalism: Reflections Inspired by WTO Accession", China Economic Review, Vol. 12, No. 2/3, pp. 107-136.
  • 9World Economic Forum, 2000, The Global Competitiveness Report 2000, Oxford University Press.
  • 10Zainal Aznam Yusof,2003, "Malaysia's Response to the China Challenge", Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 2 No. 2, Spring/Summer, pp.46-73.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部