期刊文献+

基于本体的跨语言信息检索模型 被引量:10

An Ontology-Based Cross Language Information Retrieval Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着网络信息的日益丰富和用户需求的提高 ,人们已经不能满足于仅仅在同一语种中进行检索 ,跨语言的信息检索 (CLIR)因而受到人们越来越多的关注。为此 ,本文提出了一种新的基于语义的跨语言信息检索模型Onto CLIR ,该模型在传统信息检索技术的基础上 ,利用本体来刻画不同语言中对应的领域知识 ,以解决从查询语言到检索语言之间转换过程中出现的语义损失和曲解等问题 ,从而保证在检索过程中能够有效地遵循用户的查询意图 ,获得预期的检索信息。本文以体育新闻检索为背景 ,以英文查询作为查询请求 ,检索来自新浪网的体育类新闻 ,结果表明采用基于本体的跨语言信息检索方法之后检索的查全率和查准率平均提高 10个百分点左右 ,有效地改善了检索性能。 With the enrichment of network information and the improvement of the user's needs, people are not satisfied with retrieving in the same kind of language. So Cross Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) receives people's more and more concerns. One of kernel problem of CLIR is how to overcome communication obstacles between different languages. This paper proposes a novel semantic based CLIR model Onto CLIR. The model, basing on the technologies of traditional information retrieval, uses Ontology to describe the relevant domain knowledge in different kinds of languages. Thus the problems of semantic loss and distortion when translating between query language and retrieval language can be solved. In this way we can ensure that the model will follow user's query intention and get the expected results. We have done experiments to validate our approach. The experiments are designed to retrieve sport news in Chinese from Sina website with query in English. The experiment results demonstrate that when applying our ontology based CLIR approach the increases of the retrieval recall and precision both have reached more than 10 percent, which shows that our approach is effective in improving retrieval performance.
出处 《中文信息学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期1-8,60,共9页 Journal of Chinese Information Processing
基金 国家自然科学基金资助 ( 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 ) 安微省自然科学基金资助 ( 0 10 4 2 30 2 )
关键词 计算机应用 中文信息处理 本体 跨语言信息检索 语义 computer application Chinese information processing ontology CLIR semantic
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1P.F.Brown,J.Cocke,S.Della Pietra,et al.A Statistical Approach to Machine Translation[J],Computational Linguistics,1990,16(2).
  • 2J.Y.Nie,M.Simard,P.Isabelle,et al.Cross-Language Information Retrieval based on Parallel Texts and Automatic Mining of Parallel Texts in the Web[C],22nd ACM-SIGIR,Berkeley,1999,74-81.
  • 3J.Xu,R.Weischedel,and C.Nguyen.Evaluating a Probabilistic Model for Cross-lingual Information Retrieval[A].In:Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval[C],2001,105-110.
  • 4K.L.Kwok,L.Grunfeld,N.Dinstl,et al.TREC-9 Cross Language,Web and Question-Answering Track Experiments using PIRCS[A].In:Proceedings of the 9th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC9)[C],2000,419-429.
  • 5T.Hedlund,H.Keskustalo,E.Airio,et al.UTACLIR-An Extendable Query Translation System.In Workshop on Cross-Language Information Retrieval:A Research Roadmap[C],Organized at 22nd International Conference On Research and Development in Information Retrieval,S
  • 6L.Ballesteros,W.B.Croft,Resolving Ambiguity for Cross-Language Retrieval[A],Proceedings of ACM SIGIR[C],1998,64-71.
  • 7Gao,J.Nie,JY,Xun,E.Zhang,J.,et al.Improving query translation for cross-language information retrieval using statistical models[C],SIGIR 2001,96-104.
  • 8S.Decker,D.Fensel,F.van Harmelen,et al.Knowledge representation on the web[A].In:Proceedings of the 2000 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2000)[C],Aachen,Germany,2000.
  • 9I.Horrocks,D.Fensel,C.Goble,et al.The ontology inference layer oil[Z].Technical report,Free University of Amsterdam,2000.http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/.
  • 10R Neches,R Fikes,T Finin,et al.Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing[J].AI Magazine,1991,12(3):36-56.

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Lassila O, Swick R R. Resource description framework (RDF)Model and syntax specification. Recommendation, W3C,February 1999. http://www. w3. org/TR/1999/RECrdfsyntax-19990222
  • 2[2]W3C. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1. 0: RDF Schema. W3C Candidate Recommendations are available at http://www. w3. org/TR, 30 April 2002. Edited by Dan Brickley and R.V. Guha
  • 3[3]Horrocks I,Fensel D,Goble C,et al. The ontology inference layer oil: [Technical report]. Free University of Amsterdam, 2000.http://www. ontoknowledge. org/oil/
  • 4[4]Decker S, Fensel D, van Harmelen F, et al. Knowledge representation on the web. In: Proc. of the 2000 Intl. Workshop on Description Logics(DL2000), Aachen, Germany, 2000
  • 5[5]Horrocks I, Sattler U. Ontology reasoning in the SHOQ (D)description logic. In:B. Nebel, ed. Proc. of the Seventeenth Intl.Joint Conf. on Articial Intelligence (IJCAI-01), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 2001. 199~204
  • 6[6]Horrocks I. A denotational semantics for Standard OIL and Instance OIL, 2000. http://www. ontoknowledge. org/oil/downl/semantics. pdf
  • 7[7]Horrocks I, Sattler U, Tobies S. Reasoning with individuals for the description logic shiq. In:Proc. of CADE-17, number 1831 in LNCS,Springer-Verlag, 2000. 482~496
  • 8[8]Franklin S,Graesser A. Is it an Agent, or just a Program: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents. In: Proc. of the Third Intl.Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96) ,Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 193~206
  • 9[9]Stojanovic L, Stojanovic N, Handschuh S. Evolution of the Metadata in the Ontology-based Knowledge Management Systems. In:Mirjam Minor, Steffen Staab, eds. Proc. 1st German Worksshop on Experience Management, March,2002
  • 10[10]Doran J E, Franklin S, Jennings N R, Norman T J. On cooperation in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review,1997, 12(3), Available at:http://www. elec. qmw. ac.uk/dai/pubs/fomas. html

共引文献4

同被引文献128

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部