婚内强奸的刑法学分析

The Criminal Jurisprudence Analysis of Rape in Wedlock

能否在强奸罪中评价婚内强奸是目前刑事司法实践中最富争议的问题 ,刑法理论对此存肯定论与否定论的对立。强奸罪的法益应该是双重的 ,包括妇女的性权利及社会的性秩序 ,婚内强奸虽然侵犯妇女性权利 ,但并不侵犯社会的性秩序。婚内强奸因缺失强奸罪客体要件而不成立强奸罪 ,对此行为应在伤害罪或虐待罪中加以评价。

It’s a most disputed question that we can evaluate the wedlock rape in the crime of rape. The theory of criminal law has two opposite views: positive theory and negative theory. The legal interest of rape crime is dual. It’s not only include the woman’s sexual rights but also includes the sexual order of society. Though rape in wedlock violates the woman’s sexual rights, it does not violate the sexual order of society. Therefore wedlock rape cannot constitute the crime of rape for the lack of object essentials. Those acts should be discussed in the crime of injury or abusing.