期刊文献+

Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma:In comparison with CEA 被引量:43

Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma:In comparison with CEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult,making management approaches problematic. A reliable serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful diagnostic test. The aims of our study were to evaluate the usefulness of a serum CA19-9 determination in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.METHODS: We prospectively measured serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n=35), benign biliary diseases (n=92), and healthy individuals (n=15). Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis.RESULTS:The sensitivity of a CA19-9 value>37KU·L^-1 and a CEA value >22μg·L^-1 in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma were 77.14% and 68.57%, respectively. When compared with the benign biliary diseases group,the true negative rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 84.78% and 81.52%,respectively. The false positive rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 15.22% and 18.48%, whereas the accuracy of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 82.68% and 77.95%,respectively. Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were significantly elevated (P<0.001 and P<0.05) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (290.31±5.34KU·L^-1 and 36.46±18.03μg·L^-1) compared with patients with benign biliary diseases (13.38±2.59KU·L^-1 and 13.84±3.85μg·L^-1) and healthy individuals (12.78±3.69KU·L^-1 and 11.48±3.37μg·L^-1). In 15 patients undergoing curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma,the mean serum CA19-9 concentration was decreased from a preoperative level of 286.41±4.36KU·L^-1 to a postoperative level of 62.01±17.43KU·L^-1 (P<0.001), and the mean serum CEA concentration from 39.41±24.35μg·L^-1 to 28.69±11.03μg·L6-1(P<0.05). In patients with cholangiocarcinoma,however, no correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations (r=-0.036).CONCLUSION:These data suggest that the serum CA19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Serum CA19-9 is an effective tumor marker in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma,deciding whether the tumor has been radically resected and monitoring effect of treatment. AIM:The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult, making management approaches problematic.A reliable serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful diagnostic test.The aims of our study were to evaluate the usefulness of a serum CA19-9 determination in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS:We prospectively measured serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n=35),benign biliary diseases (n=92),and healthy individuals (n=15).Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis. RESULTS:The sensitivity of a CA19-9 value >37 KU·L^(-1) and a CEA value >22 μg·L^(-1) in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma were 77.14% and 68.57%,respectively.When compared with the benign biliary diseases group,the true negative rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 84.78% and 81.52%, respectively.The false positive rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 15.22% and 18.48%,whereas the accuracy of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 82.68% and 77.95%, respectively.Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were significantly elevated (P<0.001 and P<0.05) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (290.31±5.34 KU·L^(-1) and 36.46±18.03 μg·L^(-1)) compared with patients with benign biliary diseases (13.38±2.59 KU·L^(-1) and 13.84±3.85 μg·L^(-1)) and healthy individuals (12.78±3.69 KU·L^(-1) and 11.48±3.37 μg·L^(-1)).In 15 patients undergoing curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma, the mean serum CA19-9 concentration was decreased from a preoperative level of 286.41±4.36 KU·L^(-1) to a postoperative level of 62.01±17.43 KU·L^(-1) (P<0.001),and the mean serum CEA concentration from 39.41±24.35 μg·L^(1) to 28.69±11.03 μg·L^(-1)(P<0.05).In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, however,no correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations (r=0.036). CONCLUSION:These data suggest that the serum CA19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.Serum CA19-9 is an effective tumor marker in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma, deciding whether the tumor has been radically resected and monitoring effect of treatment.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2004年第3期427-432,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Hoglund C, RobertsPJ, Kuusela P, et al . Evaluati on of CA19-9 as an serum tumor marker in pancreatic cancer〔J〕. Br J Cancer, 1986; 53(2)∶197
  • 2陆雪龙 王百正 时红珍.CA19—9RIA的临床观察〔J〕[J].放射免疫学杂志,1992,5(4):222-222.
  • 3秦兴雷 石景森 王作仁等.血清和胆汁CA19—9、CEA联合检测在胆道疾病中的对比研究〔J〕[J].中华实验外科杂志,1997,:28-28.
  • 4Ohshio G, Manabe T, Watanable Y, et al. Comparative studies of DU-PAN-2,carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA19-9 in the serum and bile of patie nts with pancreaticand biliary tract disease: evaluation of the influence of ob structive jaundice 〔J〕.Am J Gastroenterol, 1990; 85(10)∶1370
  • 5Albert MB, Steinberg WM, Henry JP. Elevated serum levels of tumor m arker CA19-9 inacute cholangitis 〔J〕. Dig Dis Sci, 1988; 33(10)∶1223
  • 6Ker CG, Chen JS, Lee KT, et al. Assessment of serum and bile le vels of CA19-9 andCA125 in cholangitis and bile duct carcinoma 〔J〕. J Gastr oenterol Hepatol, 1991; 6(5)∶505
  • 7Matsuda M, Shimizu Y, Chikamatsu E, et al. Role of carcinoembry onic antigen,carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and cytology of bile in diagnosis of bi liary and pancreaticcancer 〔J〕. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 1991; 92(6)∶716
  • 8石景森,秦兴雷.CA19-9在胆囊癌诊断中的价值[J].普外基础与临床杂志,1997,4(2):110-111. 被引量:11
  • 9Takashi Ueda,Etsuji Shimada,Tomoaki Urakawa.The clinicopathologic features of serum CA 19-9-positive colorectal cancers[J].Surgery Today.1994(6)
  • 10G. V. Kornek,D. Depisch,H. R. Rosen,E. M. Temsch,W. Scheithauer.Comparative analysis of CA72-4, CA195 and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies[J].Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.1992(4)

共引文献129

同被引文献342

引证文献43

二级引证文献221

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部